Jacobo Díaz-Polo
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 5%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 2%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Neurology
- Co-authors
- Iván AgullóEduardo J. S. VillaseñorJ. Fernando Barbero G.Alejandro CorichiEtera R. LivineThomas CailleteauJulien GrainAurélien Barrau
- Topics
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (15 papers)Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (15 papers)Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (11 papers)
- Journals
- Physical Review LettersClassical and Quantum GravityJournal of Physics Conference Series
- Partner nations
- United StatesSpainGermany
In The Last Decade
Jacobo Díaz-Polo
14 papers receiving 294 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 10
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 299
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 294
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 260
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 29
- Neurology 12
Countries citing papers authored by Jacobo Díaz-Polo
This map shows the geographic impact of Jacobo Díaz-Polo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacobo Díaz-Polo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacobo Díaz-Polo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jacobo Díaz-Polo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacobo Díaz-Polo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacobo Díaz-Polo. The network helps show where Jacobo Díaz-Polo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jacobo Díaz-Polo
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jacobo Díaz-Polo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jacobo Díaz-Polo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jacobo Díaz-Polo. Jacobo Díaz-Polo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 27 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 48 | |
| 9 | 31 | |
| 10 | 35 | |
| 11 | 69 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | Note on black hole radiation spectrum in Loop Quantum Gravity | 2 |
| 15 | 50 |
About Jacobo Díaz-Polo
Jacobo Díaz-Polo is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 15 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (15 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (15 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (294 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (299 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (260 citations). Jacobo Díaz-Polo has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Iván Agulló, Eduardo J. S. Villaseñor, J. Fernando Barbero G., Alejandro Corichi, Etera R. Livine, Thomas Cailleteau, Julien Grain, Aurélien Barrau, Xiangyu Cao and Laurent Freidel. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Classical and Quantum Gravity and Journal of Physics Conference Series.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.