Jacob Sterbenz
- Mathematical Physics top 2%
- Applied Mathematics top 2%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 5%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Daniel TataruIgor RodnianskiPieter BlueMatei MachedonHans LindbladJoachim KriegerAlexander M. PowellJohn J. Benedetto
- Topics
- Advanced Mathematical Physics Problems (13 papers)Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (5 papers)Navier-Stokes equation solutions (4 papers)
- Journals
- Communications in Mathematical PhysicsAnnals of MathematicsTransactions of the American Mathematical Society
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustriaSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Jacob Sterbenz
14 papers receiving 433 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 25
- Mathematical Physics 427
- Applied Mathematics 221
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 155
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 152
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 86
Countries citing papers authored by Jacob Sterbenz
This map shows the geographic impact of Jacob Sterbenz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacob Sterbenz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacob Sterbenz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jacob Sterbenz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacob Sterbenz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacob Sterbenz. The network helps show where Jacob Sterbenz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jacob Sterbenz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jacob Sterbenz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jacob Sterbenz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jacob Sterbenz. Jacob Sterbenz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 23 | |
| 3 | 25 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 59 | |
| 6 | 83 | |
| 7 | 68 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 67 | |
| 12 | 71 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 28 |
About Jacob Sterbenz
Jacob Sterbenz is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Applied Mathematics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 480 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Mathematical Physics Problems (13 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (5 papers) and Navier-Stokes equation solutions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (427 citations), Applied Mathematics (221 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (155 citations). Jacob Sterbenz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Austria and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Tataru, Igor Rodnianski, Pieter Blue, Matei Machedon, Hans Lindblad, Joachim Krieger, Alexander M. Powell, John J. Benedetto and Wojciech Czaja. Their work appears in journals such as Communications in Mathematical Physics, Annals of Mathematics and Transactions of the American Mathematical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.