Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A systematic review of the psychological and social benefits of participation in sport for children and adolescents: informing development of a conceptual model of health through sport
20131.5k citationsRochelle Eime, Jack Harvey et al.profile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Harvey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Harvey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Harvey more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Harvey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Harvey. The network helps show where Jack Harvey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jack Harvey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jack Harvey.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jack Harvey based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jack Harvey. Jack Harvey is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mesagno, Christopher, et al.. (2016). Igniting the pressure acclimatization training debate: Contradictory pilot-study evidence from Australian football.. FedUni ResearchOnline (Federation University Australia). 39(1). 22.7 indexed citations
Eime, Rochelle, Jack Harvey, Melanie Charity, & Meghan Casey. (2014). Physical Activity, Sport, and Health in the City of Brimbank: A Report to Mitchell Institute for Health and Education Policy. Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University).1 indexed citations
Benson, et al.. (2007). Abundance, distribution, and habitat of leatherback turtles (Dermochelys coriacea) off California, 1990-2003. Fishery Bulletin. 337–347.44 indexed citations
15.
Payne, Warren, et al.. (2004). Technical note : The use of subject derived scale factors for one-camera 2D analysis in underwater swimming. Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University).7 indexed citations
16.
Harvey, Jack, Barry Golding, & Christine Hayes. (2004). Adult Learning through Fire and Emergency Service Organisations in Small and Remote Australian Towns.. National Centre for Vocational Education Research.9 indexed citations
17.
Cowley, Stephen J., et al.. (2003). Impact of health and safety representative training on concepts of accident causation and prevention. FedUni ResearchOnline (Federation University Australia). 19(3). 279–292.2 indexed citations
18.
Payne, Warren, et al.. (2002). Reducing the energy cost of dragging sheep during sheep shearing. Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University).3 indexed citations
19.
Harvey, Jack. (2002). POPULATION ESTIMATION MODELS BASED ON INDIVIDUAL TM PIXELS. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 68(11). 1181–1192.76 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.