J. W. Lynn
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 2%
- Condensed Matter Physics top 1%
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials top 5%
- Materials Chemistry top 10%
- Geophysics top 10%
- Co-authors
- R. M. NicklowH. A. MookH. G. SmithJ. F. CookeH. L. DavisT. SuzukiRobin ChisnellAravind Devarakonda
- Topics
- Nuclear Physics and Applications (12 papers)Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (11 papers)Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (10 papers)
- Cited by
- Condensed Matter PhysicsElectronic, Optical and Magnetic MaterialsAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomIndia
In The Last Decade
J. W. Lynn
52 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.3k
- Condensed Matter Physics 970
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 764
- Materials Chemistry 412
- Geophysics 187
Countries citing papers authored by J. W. Lynn
This map shows the geographic impact of J. W. Lynn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. W. Lynn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. W. Lynn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. W. Lynn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. W. Lynn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. W. Lynn. The network helps show where J. W. Lynn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. W. Lynn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. W. Lynn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. W. Lynn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. W. Lynn. J. W. Lynn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 250 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | Electronic phase separation in the doped spin-orbit driven Mott phase of Sr3(Ir1-xRux)2O7 | 2 |
| 5 | 52 | |
| 6 | 97 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 101 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 80 | |
| 16 | 270 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 232 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About J. W. Lynn
J. W. Lynn is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Radiation and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, having authored 54 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear Physics and Applications (12 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (11 papers) and Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (970 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (764 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.3k citations). J. W. Lynn has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include R. M. Nicklow, H. A. Mook, H. G. Smith, H. A. Mook, J. F. Cooke, H. L. Davis, T. Suzuki, Robin Chisnell, Aravind Devarakonda and J. G. Checkelsky. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Physical Review Letters and Physical review. B, Condensed matter.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.