Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A new look at density limits in tokamaks
1988557 citationsM. Greenwald, J. Terry et al.Nuclear Fusionprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Terry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Terry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Terry more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Terry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Terry. The network helps show where J. Terry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Terry
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Terry.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Terry based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. Terry. J. Terry is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
LaBombard, B., et al.. (2017). Boundary plasma heat flux width measurements for poloidal magnetic fields above 1 Tesla in the Alcator C-Mod tokamak. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2017.1 indexed citations
LaBombard, B., et al.. (2016). Divertor conditions near double null in Alcator C-Mod. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2016.1 indexed citations
6.
Baek, S. G., et al.. (2016). Comparisons of Measured Gas Puff Emissions with DEGAS 2 Modeling of Alcator C-Mod Plasmas. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2016.1 indexed citations
7.
Wukitch, S.J., B. LaBombard, Y. Lin, M.L. Reinke, & J. Terry. (2014). ICRF-induced core impurities: Source and transport studies of ICRF conventional and field aligned ICRF antennas. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2014.
8.
Terry, J.. (2014). Improved confinement in ELM-suppressed high-density H-modes at the ITER field via modification of the plasma boundary with Lower Hybrid RF. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2014.
9.
Brunner, D., A. Hubbard, B. LaBombard, et al.. (2013). ICRF Compatibility with Metallic PFCs: Implications for ITER. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 2013.
10.
Baek, S. G., R.R. Parker, S. Shiraiwa, et al.. (2012). Comparison of lower-hybrid frequency spectra at the high-field and low-field side in Alcator C-Mod. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 54.1 indexed citations
Irby, J., B. LaBombard, B. Lipschultz, et al.. (2003). Elemental Boron Injector for Wall Conditioning on the Alcator C-Mod Tokamak. APS Division of Plasma Physics Meeting Abstracts. 45.1 indexed citations
15.
Mikkelsen, D. R., G. Taylor, W. Dorland, et al.. (2002). Nonlinear Simulations of Drift-Wave Turbulence in Alcator C-Mod. APS Division of Plasma Physics Meeting Abstracts. 44.
16.
Mikkelsen, D. R., G. Taylor, W. Dorland, et al.. (2001). Nonlinear Simulations of Drift-Wave Turbulence in Alcator C-Mod H-mode Plasmas. APS Division of Plasma Physics Meeting Abstracts. 43.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.