J. T. Mitchell
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Co-authors
- A. I. Florescu-MitchellR.J. HolroydM. J. TannenbaumP. W. StankusD. V. PerepelitsaP.A. DavenportJ. BoothEdward Jackson
- Topics
- Fusion materials and technologies (5 papers)Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (4 papers)Magnetic confinement fusion research (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
J. T. Mitchell
13 papers receiving 360 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 137
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 120
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 95
- Spectroscopy 90
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 75
Countries citing papers authored by J. T. Mitchell
This map shows the geographic impact of J. T. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. T. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. T. Mitchell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. T. Mitchell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. T. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. T. Mitchell. The network helps show where J. T. Mitchell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. T. Mitchell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. T. Mitchell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. T. Mitchell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. T. Mitchell. J. T. Mitchell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 24 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 289 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | Reactor costs and maintenance, with reference to the Culham Mark II conceptual Tokamak reactor design | 1 |
| 8 | Energy Balance and Efficiency of Power Stations with a Pulsed Tokamak Reactor | 1 |
| 9 | Wall loading limitations in a helium cooled fusion reactor blanket | 3 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | Comparison of direct and indirect cooling of fusion reactor blanket containing lithium | 1 |
| 12 | ECONOMIC GENERATION OF POWER FROM THERMONUCLEAR FUSION. | 10 |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 4 |
About J. T. Mitchell
J. T. Mitchell is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Aerospace Engineering and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 14 papers that have together received 374 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fusion materials and technologies (5 papers), Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (4 papers) and Magnetic confinement fusion research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (90 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (65 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (75 citations). J. T. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include A. I. Florescu-Mitchell, R.J. Holroyd, M. J. Tannenbaum, P. W. Stankus, D. V. Perepelitsa, P.A. Davenport, J. Booth, Edward Jackson, R. S. Pease and P. C. Thonemann. Their work appears in journals such as Physics Reports, Nuclear Physics A and IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.