Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden
20132.0k citationsE Hernlund, A Svedbom et al.Archives of Osteoporosisprofile →
Osteoporosis in the European Union: a compendium of country-specific reports
2013547 citationsA Svedbom, E Hernlund et al.Archives of Osteoporosisprofile →
Capture the Fracture: a Best Practice Framework and global campaign to break the fragility fracture cycle
2013358 citationsKristina Åkesson, David Marsh et al.Osteoporosis Internationalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of J Stenmark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J Stenmark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J Stenmark more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J Stenmark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J Stenmark. The network helps show where J Stenmark may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J Stenmark
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J Stenmark.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J Stenmark based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J Stenmark. J Stenmark is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Svedbom, A, E Hernlund, M Ivergård, et al.. (2013). Epidemiology and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis in Ireland. Archives of Osteoporosis. 8.1 indexed citations
2.
Ivergård, M, A Svedbom, E Hernlund, et al.. (2013). Epidemiology and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis in Slovenia. Archives of Osteoporosis. 8.
3.
Ivergård, M, A Svedbom, E Hernlund, et al.. (2013). Epidemiology and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis in Romania. Archives of Osteoporosis. 8.
4.
Svedbom, A, E Hernlund, M Ivergård, et al.. (2013). Epidemiology and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis in Denmark. Archives of Osteoporosis. 8.1 indexed citations
5.
Ivergård, M, A Svedbom, E Hernlund, et al.. (2013). Epidemiology and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis in UK. Archives of Osteoporosis. 8.4 indexed citations
6.
Ivergård, M, A Svedbom, E Hernlund, et al.. (2013). Epidemiology and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis in Slovakia. Archives of Osteoporosis. 8.
7.
Svedbom, A, E Hernlund, M Ivergård, et al.. (2013). Epidemiology and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis in Austria A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Archives of Osteoporosis. 8.13 indexed citations
8.
Svedbom, A, E Hernlund, M Ivergård, et al.. (2013). Epidemiology and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis in France. Archives of Osteoporosis. 8.2 indexed citations
9.
Svedbom, A, E Hernlund, M Ivergård, et al.. (2013). Epidemiology and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis in Bulgaria. Archives of Osteoporosis. 8.1 indexed citations
10.
Svedbom, A, E Hernlund, M Ivergård, et al.. (2013). Epidemiology and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis in Greece. Archives of Osteoporosis. 8.6 indexed citations
11.
Ivergård, M, A Svedbom, E Hernlund, et al.. (2013). Epidemiology and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis in Spain. Archives of Osteoporosis. 8.4 indexed citations
12.
Ivergård, M, A Svedbom, E Hernlund, et al.. (2013). Epidemiology and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis in Poland. Archives of Osteoporosis. 8.
13.
Ivergård, M, A Svedbom, E Hernlund, et al.. (2013). Epidemiology and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis in Sweden. Archives of Osteoporosis. 8.1 indexed citations
14.
Åkesson, Kristina, David Marsh, Paul Mitchell, et al.. (2013). Capture the Fracture: a Best Practice Framework and global campaign to break the fragility fracture cycle. Osteoporosis International. 24(8). 2135–2152.358 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Svedbom, A, E Hernlund, M Ivergård, et al.. (2013). Epidemiology and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis in Finland. Archives of Osteoporosis. 8.1 indexed citations
16.
Svedbom, A, E Hernlund, M Ivergård, et al.. (2013). Epidemiology and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis in Hungary. Archives of Osteoporosis. 8.
17.
Svedbom, A, E Hernlund, M Ivergård, et al.. (2013). Epidemiology and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis in the Czech Republic. Archives of Osteoporosis. 8.
18.
Ivergård, M, A Svedbom, E Hernlund, et al.. (2013). Epidemiology and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis in Portugal. Archives of Osteoporosis. 8.1 indexed citations
19.
Svedbom, A, E Hernlund, M Ivergård, et al.. (2013). Osteoporosis in the European Union: a compendium of country-specific reports. Archives of Osteoporosis. 8(1-2). 137–137.547 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Kanis, J. A., Juliet Compston, Carol Cooper, et al.. (2012). THE ECONOMIC BURDEN OF FRACTURES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION IN 2010. Osteoporosis International. 23.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.