This map shows the geographic impact of J. Srikanth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Srikanth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Srikanth more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Srikanth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Srikanth. The network helps show where J. Srikanth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Srikanth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Srikanth.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Srikanth based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. Srikanth. J. Srikanth is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Srikanth, J., et al.. (2021). Prospecting in Western Ghats of Karnataka for indigenous Bacillus thuringiensis isolates harbouring novel crystal toxin genes for sugarcane pest management. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
6.
Srikanth, J., et al.. (2019). First Report of Occurrence of Fall Armyworm Spodoptera Frugiperda in Sugarcane from Tamil Nadu, India. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.24 indexed citations
7.
Srikanth, J., et al.. (2016). Sugarcane root borer Polyocha depressella swinhoe: An overview. 4(2). 1–20.4 indexed citations
Srikanth, J., et al.. (2014). Pattern of pink stem borer Sesamia inferens (Walker) incidence in different crop seasons and Saccharum spp.. 4(1). 91–95.6 indexed citations
10.
Crickmore, Neil, et al.. (2013). Prospecting for scarabid specific Bacillus thuringiensis crystal toxin cry8 gene in sugarcane ecosystem of Tamil Nadu, India. Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex). 3(2).1 indexed citations
11.
Srikanth, J., et al.. (2011). Damage pattern of sugarcane internode borer Chilo sacchariphagus indicus (Kapur) in Tamil Nadu State, southern India.. International sugar journal. 113(1352). 590–594.7 indexed citations
Srikanth, J., et al.. (2005). Molasses-based medium requires no nitrogen supplement for culturing three entomopathogenic fungi.. Journal of Biological Control. 19(2). 135–140.5 indexed citations
16.
Easwaramoorthy, S., et al.. (2002). Mass-culture and formulation of three entomogenous fungi, with special reference to Beauveria brongniartii (Sacc.) Petch, against Holotrichia serrata F. (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)..2 indexed citations
17.
Srikanth, J., et al.. (2000). Behavioural response of Cotesia flavipes Cameron (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to frass extract of Chilo partellus Swinhoe (Lepidoptera: Crambidae).. Insect Environment. 6(2). 75–76.2 indexed citations
18.
Easwaramoorthy, S., et al.. (1996). Life History and Prey Acceptance of Commonly Occurring Spiders in Sugarcane Ecosystem. Journal of Biological Control. 10. 39–47.4 indexed citations
19.
Srikanth, J., et al.. (1988). Host Preference Studies of Cowpea Aphid Aphis Craccivora Koch. Indian journal of plant protection. 16(1). 103–107.3 indexed citations
20.
Srikanth, J., et al.. (1988). Record of new hosts for lantana bug.. 17(5). 60–61.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.