J. Procter
Impact in
- Transplantation top 5%
- Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
- Immunology top 5%
- T-cell and Retrovirus Studies
- Immune Cell Function and Interaction
- T-cell and B-cell Immunology
- Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Papers in
-
- Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments 5
-
- T-cell and B-cell Immunology 3
- Immune Cell Function and Interaction 3
- Immunotherapy and Immune Responses 2
- Mast cells and histamine 1
- T-cell and Retrovirus Studies 1
- Co-authors
- Michael BunceK. I. WelshMartin BarnardoCarlos VilchesSteven G. E. MarshMartin A. NowakMasahiro NagaiKenneth I. Welsh
- Journals
- Transplantation (2 papers)Transplant International (1 paper)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (1 paper)The Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology (1 paper)Scandinavian Journal of Haematology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSpain
In The Last Decade
J. Procter
11 papers receiving 625 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Transplantation 74
- Immunology 512
- Agronomy and Crop Science 224
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 183
- Virology 29
Countries citing papers authored by J. Procter
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Procter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Procter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Procter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. Procter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Procter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Procter. The network helps show where J. Procter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Procter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 27 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 43 | |
| 4 | C4d deposition in early renal allograft protocol biopsies | 2002 | 1 |
| 5 | 2000 | 24 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 15 | |
| 7 | 1999 | 330 | |
| 8 | 1997 | 42 | |
| 9 | 1997 | 31 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 121 | |
| 11 | 1980 | 4 |
About J. Procter
J. Procter is a scholar working on Transplantation, Immunology, Hematology, Nephrology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 11 papers that have together received 640 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (5 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (3 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (3 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (3 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (2 papers), Mast cells and histamine (1 paper), T-cell and Retrovirus Studies (1 paper) and Viral-associated cancers and disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (74 citations), Immunology (512 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (224 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (183 citations) and Virology (29 citations). J. Procter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Michael Bunce, K. I. Welsh, Martin Barnardo, Carlos Vilches, Steven G. E. Marsh, Martin A. Nowak, Masahiro Nagai, Kenneth I. Welsh, Daisuke Kodama and Shuji Izumo. Their work appears in journals such as Transplantation, Transplant International, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology and Scandinavian Journal of Haematology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.