J. Michael Williams
Impact in
- Organic Chemistry top 1%
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
- Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
- Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions
- Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
- Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
- Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Papers in
-
- Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis 33
- Co-authors
- Anthony C. RichardsonGlenn J. McGarveyChunhua YangRobert J. NashE.Arthur BellTaeboem OhJohn C. LindonEdward J. J. Grabowski
- Journals
- Carbohydrate Research (19 papers)Tetrahedron Letters (10 papers)The Journal of Organic Chemistry (6 papers)Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions 1 (5 papers)Microbiology (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
J. Michael Williams
93 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Organic Chemistry 1.7k
- Molecular Biology 997
- Biotechnology 114
- Pharmaceutical Science 75
- Biochemistry 89
Countries citing papers authored by J. Michael Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Michael Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Michael Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Michael Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. Michael Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Michael Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Michael Williams. The network helps show where J. Michael Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside J. Michael Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2009 | 12 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 18 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 15 | |
| 6 | 1998 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1996 | 78 | |
| 8 | 1987 | 62 | |
| 9 | 1987 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1986 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1986 | 4 | |
| 12 | 1986 | 40 | |
| 13 | 1985 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1985 | 32 | |
| 15 | 1985 | 79 | |
| 16 | 1985 | 57 | |
| 17 | 1984 | 5 | |
| 18 | 1984 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1973 | 5 | |
| 20 | 1971 | 2 |
About J. Michael Williams
J. Michael Williams is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Medicine, Biochemistry, Pharmacology and Microbiology, having authored 95 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (33 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (18 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (9 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (8 papers), Synthesis of Organic Compounds (7 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (6 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (6 papers) and Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (1.7k citations), Molecular Biology (997 citations), Biotechnology (114 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (75 citations) and Biochemistry (89 citations). J. Michael Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Anthony C. Richardson, Glenn J. McGarvey, Chunhua Yang, Robert J. Nash, E.Arthur Bell, Taeboem Oh, John C. Lindon, Edward J. J. Grabowski, Ulf‐H. Dolling and Ronald B. Jobson. Their work appears in journals such as Carbohydrate Research, Tetrahedron Letters, The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Journal of the Chemical Society Perkin Transactions 1 and Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.