J. M. Neeson

507 total citations
11 papers, 191 citations indexed

About

J. M. Neeson is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, History and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, J. M. Neeson has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 191 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 3 papers in History and 1 paper in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in J. M. Neeson's work include Historical Economic and Social Studies (6 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (1 paper) and Organic Food and Agriculture (1 paper). J. M. Neeson is often cited by papers focused on Historical Economic and Social Studies (6 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (1 paper) and Organic Food and Agriculture (1 paper). J. M. Neeson collaborates with scholars based in Canada and United Kingdom. J. M. Neeson's co-authors include David Eastwood, Peter R. Dunkley, Paul O’Higgins and B. Hepple and has published in prestigious journals such as The American Historical Review, The Economic History Review and Past & Present.

In The Last Decade

J. M. Neeson

9 papers receiving 143 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
J. M. Neeson Canada	4	87	64	44	36	28	11	191
Harold Carter United Kingdom	10	53 0.6×	71 1.1×	63 1.4×	47 1.3×	15 0.5×	26	268
B. A. Holderness United Kingdom	10	152 1.7×	47 0.7×	89 2.0×	35 1.0×	31 1.1×	22	258
Jürgen Schlumbohm Germany	12	151 1.7×	99 1.5×	102 2.3×	58 1.6×	19 0.7×	29	330
Carlos A. Schwantes United States	8	18 0.2×	93 1.5×	16 0.4×	41 1.1×	24 0.9×	40	233
Jill Roe Australia	7	28 0.3×	118 1.8×	31 0.7×	29 0.8×	8 0.3×	31	215
Brian Short United Kingdom	8	42 0.5×	54 0.8×	36 0.8×	7 0.2×	15 0.5×	26	175
György Ránki Hungary	9	96 1.1×	111 1.7×	25 0.6×	132 3.7×	7 0.3×	31	311
Jacob Metzer Israel	9	117 1.3×	124 1.9×	19 0.4×	61 1.7×	41 1.5×	19	287
Pierre-Étienne Will France	8	107 1.2×	213 3.3×	26 0.6×	79 2.2×	31 1.1×	43	310
W. O. Ault	6	124 1.4×	32 0.5×	70 1.6×	54 1.5×	14 0.5×	14	239

Countries citing papers authored by J. M. Neeson

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. M. Neeson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. M. Neeson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. M. Neeson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. M. Neeson

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. M. Neeson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. M. Neeson. The network helps show where J. M. Neeson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. M. Neeson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. M. Neeson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. M. Neeson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. M. Neeson. J. M. Neeson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Neeson, J. M.. (2005). R. W. Hoyle (ed.), People, landscape and alternative agriculture. Essays for Joan Thirsk. 79(1). 109. 1 indexed citations

2.

Neeson, J. M.. (2002). Social Unrest and Popular Protest in England, 1780-1840. The English Historical Review. 117(473). 995–997. 1 indexed citations

3.

Neeson, J. M.. (2000). English Enclosures and British Peasants: Current Debates about Rural Social Structure in Britain c.1750-1870. Jahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte / Economic History Yearbook. 41(2). 2 indexed citations

4.

Neeson, J. M.. (1999). La clôture des terres et la société rurale britannique : une revue critique. Histoire économie et société. 18(1). 83–106. 1 indexed citations

5.

Neeson, J. M.. (1996). David Eastwood. Governing Rural England: Tradition and Transformation in Local Government, 1780–1840. (Oxford Historical Monographs.) New York: Clarendon Press of Oxford University Press. 1994. Pp. xiii, 311. $55.00. The American Historical Review. 101(1). 182–182. 1 indexed citations

6.

Neeson, J. M. & David Eastwood. (1996). Governing Rural England: Tradition and Transformation in Local Government, 1780-1840.. The American Historical Review. 101(1). 182–182. 15 indexed citations

7.

Dunkley, Peter R. & J. M. Neeson. (1995). Commoners: Common Right, Enclosure and Social Change in England, 1700-1820.. The American Historical Review. 100(5). 1567–1567. 12 indexed citations

8.

Neeson, J. M., et al.. (1994). Commoners: Common Right, Enclosure and Social Change in England, 1700-1820.. The Economic History Review. 47(4). 818–818. 1 indexed citations

9.

Neeson, J. M.. (1993). Commoners. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 133 indexed citations

10.

Neeson, J. M.. (1984). THE OPPONENTS OF ENCLOSURE IN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY NORTHAMPTONSHIRE. Past & Present. 105(1). 114–139. 23 indexed citations

11.

Neeson, J. M., B. Hepple, & Paul O’Higgins. (1975). A bibliography of the literature on British and Irish labour law. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact