Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Natural movement: or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement
19931.0k citationsB Hillier, Alan Penn et al.Environment and Planning B Planning and Designprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of J Hanson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J Hanson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J Hanson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J Hanson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J Hanson. The network helps show where J Hanson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J Hanson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J Hanson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J Hanson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J Hanson. J Hanson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Hanson, J, et al.. (2007). The Accessible Toilet Resource. UCL Discovery (University College London).9 indexed citations
2.
Hanson, J. (2005). The Housing and Support Needs of Adults Aged 18-55 with Impaired Vision: a good practice guide. UCL Discovery (University College London).6 indexed citations
Hanson, J. (2003). Space in the Home: morphology and meaning in the home life of older people. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
5.
Percival, John, et al.. (2003). Meeting the needs of older peoplewith visual impairment: social care orsocial exclusion?. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
6.
Hanson, J, et al.. (2002). Housing and Support Needs of Older People with Visual Impairment - experiences and challenges. UCL Discovery (University College London).10 indexed citations
7.
Hanson, J. (2001). Morphology and design: reconciling intellect, intuition, and ethics in the reflective practice of architecture. UCL Discovery (University College London).6 indexed citations
Hillier, B, Alan Penn, J Hanson, Tadeusz Grajewski, & Jianwei Xu. (1993). Natural movement: or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B Planning and Design. 20(1). 29–66.1001 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Hillier, Wrg, J Hanson, & John Peponis. (1987). Syntactic Analysis of Settlements. UCL Discovery (University College London).50 indexed citations
Hanson, J & B Hillier. (1987). The architecture of community: some new proposals on the social consequences of architectural and planning decisions. UCL Discovery (University College London).37 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.