J. H. Dixon
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Surgery top 10%
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 0.5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Co-authors
- C. PRYS‐ROBERTSR. M. TACKLEYG T R LewisF. L. RobertsJohn BillingsMartin BardsleyAdam SteventonHoward Glennerster
- Topics
- Healthcare Policy and Management (10 papers)Health Services Management and Policy (9 papers)Primary Care and Health Outcomes (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesIndia
In The Last Decade
J. H. Dixon
57 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
- General Health Professions 520
- Surgery 484
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 446
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 316
- Economics and Econometrics 257
Countries citing papers authored by J. H. Dixon
This map shows the geographic impact of J. H. Dixon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. H. Dixon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. H. Dixon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. H. Dixon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. H. Dixon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. H. Dixon. The network helps show where J. H. Dixon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. H. Dixon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. H. Dixon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. H. Dixon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. H. Dixon. J. H. Dixon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 23 | |
| 3 | 36 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | Does weight loss improve survival? Comparison of a bariatric surgical cohort with an obese community-based control group. | 1 |
| 7 | 23 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 134 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 35 | |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | 33 | |
| 17 | 35 | |
| 18 | 21 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 25 |
About J. H. Dixon
J. H. Dixon is a scholar working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, General Health Professions and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 59 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Policy and Management (10 papers), Health Services Management and Policy (9 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (446 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (167 citations) and Health Information Management (99 citations). J. H. Dixon has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include C. PRYS‐ROBERTS, R. M. TACKLEY, G T R Lewis, F. L. Roberts, John Billings, Martin Bardsley, Adam Steventon, Howard Glennerster, Helen Doll and Martín Knapp. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, PEDIATRICS and Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.