J. Günther
- Topics
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (1 paper)High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (1 paper)Byzantine Studies and History (1 paper)
- Journals
- Nuclear Physics AKlio
In The Last Decade
J. Günther
1 paper receiving 3 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 2 of 2
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 3
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1
Countries citing papers authored by J. Günther
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Günther's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Günther with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Günther more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. Günther
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Günther. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Günther. The network helps show where J. Günther may publish in the future.
All Works
About J. Günther
J. Günther is a scholar working on Classics, History and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 2 papers that have together received 3 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (1 paper), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (1 paper) and Byzantine Studies and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (3 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1 citation) and Infectious Diseases (0 citations). Their work appears in journals such as Nuclear Physics A and Klio.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.