J Griffith

1.5k total citations
19 papers, 709 citations indexed

About

J Griffith is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, J Griffith has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 709 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Surgery, 7 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 7 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in J Griffith's work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (6 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (3 papers) and Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (3 papers). J Griffith is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (6 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (3 papers) and Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (3 papers). J Griffith collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and Australia. J Griffith's co-authors include H M Sue-Ling, M J McMahon, I. G. Martin, M F Dixon, David A. Johnston, Michael McMahon, D Johnston, A. T. R. Axon, Henry Sue‐Ling and J D Davies and has published in prestigious journals such as Cancer Research, Gut and British journal of surgery.

In The Last Decade

J Griffith

18 papers receiving 681 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
J Griffith United Kingdom	12	423	409	178	151	68	19	709
Aleix Martínez‐Pérez Spain	16	516 1.2×	257 0.6×	420 2.4×	24 0.2×	44 0.6×	47	706
Guy Blackshaw United Kingdom	17	439 1.0×	460 1.1×	207 1.2×	139 0.9×	33 0.5×	33	790
John Maret‐Ouda Sweden	14	505 1.2×	160 0.4×	65 0.4×	392 2.6×	66 1.0×	31	773
Pawanindra Lal India	15	555 1.3×	285 0.7×	102 0.6×	22 0.1×	19 0.3×	68	704
Lindsay A. Bliss United States	13	336 0.8×	141 0.3×	337 1.9×	26 0.2×	112 1.6×	30	634
Shaghayegh Aliabadi‐Wahle United States	10	375 0.9×	234 0.6×	64 0.4×	47 0.3×	59 0.9×	20	501
Michele L. Johnson United States	15	438 1.0×	285 0.7×	65 0.4×	149 1.0×	106 1.6×	48	737
Giovanni Capovilla Italy	13	471 1.1×	128 0.3×	169 0.9×	328 2.2×	27 0.4×	65	682
Ricard Corcelles United States	17	583 1.4×	165 0.4×	62 0.3×	130 0.9×	51 0.8×	59	767
Nitin Mishra United States	11	279 0.7×	86 0.2×	187 1.1×	22 0.1×	52 0.8×	46	425

Countries citing papers authored by J Griffith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J Griffith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J Griffith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J Griffith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J Griffith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J Griffith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J Griffith. The network helps show where J Griffith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J Griffith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J Griffith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J Griffith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J Griffith. J Griffith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

19 of 19 papers shown

Celentano, Valerio, Neil Smart, Ronan A. Cahill, et al.. (2020). Development and validation of a recommended checklist for assessment of surgical videos quality: the LAParoscopic surgery Video Educational GuidelineS (LAP-VEGaS) video assessment tool. Surgical Endoscopy. 35(3). 1362–1369. 50 indexed citations

Griffith, J, et al.. (2019). International Space Station Smart Sample Concentrator for Microbial Monitoring of Potable Water. ThinkTech (Texas Tech University). 2 indexed citations

Celentano, Valerio, Neil Smart, Ronan A. Cahill, et al.. (2018). Use of laparoscopic videos amongst surgical trainees in the United Kingdom. The Surgeon. 17(6). 334–339. 57 indexed citations

Anderson, Diana, Mojgan Najafzadeh, Andy Scally, et al.. (2018). Using a Modified Lymphocyte Genome Sensitivity (LGS) test or TumorScan test to detect cancer at an early stage in each individual. FASEB BioAdvances. 1(1). 32–39. 5 indexed citations

Shah, Noraida Mohamed, et al.. (2017). Abstract P1-12-05: Etirinotecan pegol: Survival advantage over standard of care drugs in a model of brain metastases of breast cancer. Cancer Research. 77(4_Supplement). P1–12. 4 indexed citations

Celentano, Valerio, et al.. (2015). Safety of supervised trainee-performed laparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 30(5). 639–644. 15 indexed citations

Mackenzie, Hugh, Danilo Mišković, Melody Ni, et al.. (2013). Clinical and educational proficiency gain of supervised laparoscopic colorectal surgical trainees. Surgical Endoscopy. 27(8). 2704–2711. 59 indexed citations

Mosley, Frances, et al.. (2013). Are “Straight to Test” Pathways Always Best for Patients? A Prospective Observational Study of Two-Week-Wait Colorectal Referrals. Surgical Science. 4(10). 443–447. 1 indexed citations

Shabbir, J., et al.. (2011). Short‐term outcome following elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection in octogenarians and nonagenarians. Colorectal Disease. 14(6). 727–730. 16 indexed citations

10.

Griffith, J, et al.. (2009). In-house colorectal laparoscopic preceptorship: a model for changing a unit’s practice safely and efficiently. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 24(7). 771–776. 4 indexed citations

11.

Davies, J D, David A. Johnston, Henry Sue‐Ling, et al.. (1998). Total or Subtotal Gastrectomy for Gastric Carcinoma? A Study of Quality of Life. World Journal of Surgery. 22(10). 1048–1055. 130 indexed citations

12.

Dexter, S. P. L., J Griffith, Peter J. Grant, & Michael McMahon. (1996). Activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis in open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgical Endoscopy. 10(11). 1069–1074. 39 indexed citations

13.

Griffith, J, et al.. (1996). Prospective randomized study of a new method of providing postoperative pain relief following femoropopliteal bypass. British journal of surgery. 83(12). 1735–1738. 19 indexed citations

14.

Griffith, J. (1996). Guidelines for cementing deepwater conductor strings. International Journal of Multiphase Flow. 22. 137–137. 1 indexed citations

15.

Griffith, J, H M Sue-Ling, I. G. Martin, et al.. (1995). Preservation of the spleen improves survival after radical surgery for gastric cancer.. Gut. 36(5). 684–690. 134 indexed citations

16.

Griffith, J, N J Everitt, F. Lancaster, et al.. (1995). Influence of laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy upon cell-mediated immunity. British journal of surgery. 82(5). 677–680. 63 indexed citations

17.

Griffith, J, et al.. (1992). Open Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective Comparative Study. Journal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery. 2(2). 81–86. 15 indexed citations

18.

Sue-Ling, H M, I. G. Martin, J Griffith, et al.. (1992). Early gastric cancer: 46 cases treated in one surgical department.. Gut. 33(10). 1318–1322. 95 indexed citations

19.

Griffith, J. (1973). The Role of Social Scientists in River Basin Planning: a Critique. Journal of Environmental Systems. 3(2). 131–151.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact