Tom Cecil

5.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
115 papers, 3.1k citations indexed

About

Tom Cecil is a scholar working on Surgery, Emergency Medicine and Reproductive Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Tom Cecil has authored 115 papers receiving a total of 3.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 85 papers in Surgery, 51 papers in Emergency Medicine and 34 papers in Reproductive Medicine. Recurrent topics in Tom Cecil's work include Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (66 papers), Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (51 papers) and Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (33 papers). Tom Cecil is often cited by papers focused on Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (66 papers), Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (51 papers) and Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (33 papers). Tom Cecil collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Tom Cecil's co-authors include Brendan Moran, Faheez Mohamed, Kandiah Chandrakumaran, Sanjeev Dayal, Norman J. Carr, Paul H. Sugarbaker, Leslie H. Sobin, Santiago González‐Moreno, Sara Chapman and Richard J. Heald and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Annals of Surgery and Gut.

In The Last Decade

Tom Cecil

107 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Hit Papers

A Consensus for Classification and Pathologic Reporting o... 2015 2026 2018 2022 2015 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tom Cecil United Kingdom 28 2.6k 1.7k 1.2k 472 282 115 3.1k
Bernard A. Birnbaum United States 33 2.4k 0.9× 1.4k 0.8× 86 0.1× 245 0.5× 1.1k 3.8× 67 4.2k
Patrice Taourel France 40 3.4k 1.3× 994 0.6× 107 0.1× 558 1.2× 1.3k 4.4× 189 5.1k
Debra A. Gervais United States 28 1.3k 0.5× 352 0.2× 252 0.2× 308 0.7× 1.1k 4.0× 64 3.1k
Derek Glenn Australia 23 696 0.3× 291 0.2× 211 0.2× 421 0.9× 1.2k 4.2× 56 2.1k
Olivier Dupuis France 27 1.1k 0.4× 142 0.1× 76 0.1× 1.3k 2.8× 585 2.1× 141 3.0k
Michael Macari United States 43 2.3k 0.9× 529 0.3× 70 0.1× 2.4k 5.1× 1.8k 6.3× 88 5.9k
Eric W. Olcott United States 22 956 0.4× 358 0.2× 32 0.0× 226 0.5× 584 2.1× 76 1.9k
John L. Nosher United States 28 794 0.3× 100 0.1× 145 0.1× 191 0.4× 555 2.0× 105 2.2k
Vassilios Raptopoulos United States 36 1.8k 0.7× 493 0.3× 40 0.0× 1.1k 2.3× 1.3k 4.5× 133 4.3k
Aya Kamaya United States 31 1.0k 0.4× 112 0.1× 148 0.1× 525 1.1× 752 2.7× 161 4.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Cecil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Cecil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Cecil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Cecil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Cecil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Cecil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Cecil. The network helps show where Tom Cecil may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tom Cecil

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tom Cecil. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tom Cecil based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tom Cecil. Tom Cecil is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Allievi, Niccolò, et al.. (2024). Survival analysis and recurrence pattern of 519 patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases treated by cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 50(2). 107410–107410. 1 indexed citations
3.
Roy, Ashok, et al.. (2023). Differences in coagulation-relevant parameters: Comparing cryoprecipitate and a human fibrinogen concentrate. PLoS ONE. 18(8). e0290571–e0290571. 9 indexed citations
4.
Allievi, Niccolò, Norman J. Carr, Francesco Di Fabio, et al.. (2023). Pseudomyxoma Peritonei Arising from Urachal Mucinous Neoplasms: a Case Series and Updated Literature Review. Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology. 14(S1). 144–150. 2 indexed citations
6.
Mason, G. Robert, Sara Burke, Tom Cecil, et al.. (2020). Outcomes of home parenteral nutrition in 34 patients with intestinal failure from recurrent or progressive peritoneal malignancy of gastro-intestinal tract origin. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 75(5). 856–858. 4 indexed citations
7.
Clarke, Laurence P., Norman J. Carr, Kandiah Chandrakumaran, et al.. (2020). Outcomes of multicystic peritoneal mesothelioma treatment with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. BJS Open. 5(2). 7 indexed citations
8.
Nors, Jesper, Jonas Amstrup Funder, Victor J. Verwaal, et al.. (2019). Postoperative paralytic ileus after cytoreductive surgery combined with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy. PubMed. 5(1). 20190026–20190026. 8 indexed citations
9.
Roy, Ashok, Savita Rangarajan, John Bell, et al.. (2019). Efficacy of fibrinogen concentrate in major abdominal surgery – A prospective, randomized, controlled study in cytoreductive surgery for pseudomyxoma peritonei. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 18(2). 352–363. 18 indexed citations
10.
Mohamed, Faheez, et al.. (2018). Do patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for peritoneal malignancy need parenteral nutrition?. PubMed. 3(4). 20180123–20180123. 6 indexed citations
11.
Celentano, Valerio, Neil Smart, Ronan A. Cahill, et al.. (2018). Use of laparoscopic videos amongst surgical trainees in the United Kingdom. The Surgeon. 17(6). 334–339. 57 indexed citations
12.
Pengelly, Reuben J., Karen Pickard, Brendan Moran, et al.. (2018). Analysis of Mutation and Loss of Heterozygosity by Whole-Exome Sequencing Yields Insights into Pseudomyxoma Peritonei. Journal of Molecular Diagnostics. 20(5). 635–642. 18 indexed citations
14.
Mehta, Akash, et al.. (2017). Preserving fertility in pseudomyxoma peritonei, a novel approach. PubMed. 2(1). 33–36. 6 indexed citations
15.
García-Fadrique, Alfonso, Akash Mehta, Faheez Mohamed, et al.. (2017). Clinical presentation, diagnosis, classification and management of peritoneal mesothelioma: a review. Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. 8(5). 915–924. 40 indexed citations
16.
Mohamed, Faheez, et al.. (2016). Cytoreductive surgery with intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of peritoneal surface malignancy: a pharmacist's perspective. European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy. 23(4). 233–238. 3 indexed citations
17.
Lord, Amy, Oliver C. Shihab, Kandiah Chandrakumaran, et al.. (2014). Recurrence and outcome after complete tumour removal and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in 512 patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei from perforated appendiceal mucinous tumours. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 41(3). 396–399. 56 indexed citations
18.
Venkatasubramaniam, A, et al.. (2010). Respect for the Laparoscopic Port Site: Lessons in Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Port-Site Hernias Following Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. 20(5). 451–454. 9 indexed citations
19.
Cartmell, Mark, et al.. (2008). A defunctioning stoma significantly prolongs the length of stay in laparoscopic colorectal resection. Surgical Endoscopy. 22(12). 2643–2647. 26 indexed citations
20.
Rothenberger, David A., et al.. (2004). Total mesorectal excision results in low local recurrence rates in lymph node-positive rectal cancer: Invited commentary. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 47(7). 1149–1150. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026