J. Folch‐Pi

1.2k citations
23 papers · 930 indexed · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

J. Folch‐Pi

22 papers receiving 809 citations

Peers

J. Folch‐Pi
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Biochemistry 131
  • Clinical Biochemistry 115
  • Molecular Biology 684
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 110
  • Physiology 168
Replace Johan Järnefelt with:
Johan Järnefelt Finland
Hildegard Debuch Germany
Toshio Ariga Japan
John S. Ellingson United States
Dorothy L. Fillerup United States
Amedeo F. D’Adamo United States
J. R. Wherrett Canada
Paolo Gazzotti Switzerland
R. F. Mitchell United Kingdom
Hitoshi Akedo Japan
J. Folch‐Pi relative to Johan Järnefelt Finland Johan Järnefelt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Johan Järnefelt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Folch‐Pi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Folch‐Pi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Folch‐Pi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Folch‐Pi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Folch‐Pi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Folch‐Pi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Folch‐Pi. The network helps show where J. Folch‐Pi may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 10 scholars most cited alongside J. Folch‐Pi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Folch‐Pi Line = papers co-authored together J. Folch‐Pi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
SOME CONSIDERATIONS ON THE STRUCTURE OF PROTEOLIPIDS.
19960
2 197638
3 1972162
4
The Folch-Pi-Lees proteolipid (FLPL).
19711
5
Comparison of myelin proteins.
19711
6 1971113
7 19704
8 197093
9 196818
10 19673
11 196717
12 19674
13 19661
14 196677
15 196546
16 196425
17 196316
18 196267
19
[Recent studies on the chemistry of the brain and their relation with the structure of the myelin sheath].
19591
20
Frationation of brain copper proteins.
19564

About J. Folch‐Pi

J. Folch‐Pi is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Nutrition and Dietetics, Clinical Biochemistry, Neurology and Spectroscopy, having authored 23 papers that have together received 930 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (4 papers), Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis (4 papers), Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors (3 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (3 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (3 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (3 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (2 papers) and Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (131 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (115 citations), Molecular Biology (684 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (110 citations) and Physiology (168 citations). J. Folch‐Pi has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Pierre Stoffyn, Francesc González‐Sastre, Gwendolyn Sherman, Richard H. Quarles, J. David Sakura, Reiko Matsumoto, E.T. Pritchard, Makoto Matsumoto, P. Mandel and Huntington Porter. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurochemistry, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Journal of Lipid Research, Advances in experimental medicine and biology and Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026