J. F. Howell
- Insect Science top 1%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Pollution top 10%
- Co-authors
- Franck E. DayanH. H. TobaLisa NevenDale L. ShanerDaniel K. OwensN. CornianiSusan B. WatsonJames L. Krysan
- Topics
- Insect Pheromone Research and Control (22 papers)Plant and animal studies (17 papers)Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomBrazil
In The Last Decade
J. F. Howell
39 papers receiving 603 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Insect Science 442
- Plant Science 285
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 177
- Molecular Biology 156
- Pollution 95
Countries citing papers authored by J. F. Howell
This map shows the geographic impact of J. F. Howell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. F. Howell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. F. Howell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. F. Howell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. F. Howell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. F. Howell. The network helps show where J. F. Howell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. F. Howell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. F. Howell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. F. Howell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. F. Howell. J. F. Howell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | |
| 2 | 39 | |
| 3 | Economic analysis of codling moth control alternatives in apple orchards | 1 |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 37 | |
| 7 | 58 | |
| 8 | An Improved System for Mass-rearing Codling Moths | 70 |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | Codling moth: effect of postemergence placement and location on the predictive value of pheromone traps. | 1 |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 33 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About J. F. Howell
J. F. Howell is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Plant Science, having authored 40 papers that have together received 721 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect Pheromone Research and Control (22 papers), Plant and animal studies (17 papers) and Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (442 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (177 citations) and Pollution (95 citations). J. F. Howell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Franck E. Dayan, H. H. Toba, Lisa Neven, Dale L. Shaner, Daniel K. Owens, N. Corniani, Susan B. Watson, James L. Krysan, David F. Brown and Jannie P.J. Marais. Their work appears in journals such as Phytochemistry, Plant Biotechnology Journal and Crop Protection.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.