Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Development of a Rasch-Type Loneliness Scale
1985977 citationsJ. de Jong-Gierveld et al.Applied Psychological Measurementprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by J. de Jong-Gierveld
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of J. de Jong-Gierveld's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. de Jong-Gierveld with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. de Jong-Gierveld more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. de Jong-Gierveld
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. de Jong-Gierveld. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. de Jong-Gierveld. The network helps show where J. de Jong-Gierveld may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. de Jong-Gierveld
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. de Jong-Gierveld.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. de Jong-Gierveld based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with J. de Jong-Gierveld. J. de Jong-Gierveld is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jong-Gierveld, J. de. (2013). Eenzaamheid 1978 : Een meersporig onderzoek. Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam).2 indexed citations
3.
Dykstra, Pearl A., et al.. (2009). Health and well-being at older ages: The interlinkage with family life histories, gender, and national contexts. Final report prepared in the context of the MAGGIE research project. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).1 indexed citations
4.
Jong-Gierveld, J. de. (2003). Ouderen en de tweede demografische transitie: de effecten van partner transities op latere leeftijd voor de familiale banden. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 32(1). 27–44.1 indexed citations
5.
Jong-Gierveld, J. de. (2003). Social networks and social well-being of older men and women living alone. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 95–110.23 indexed citations
6.
Jong-Gierveld, J. de, et al.. (2002). Partnerpaden na het vijftigste levensjaar. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 77. 116–136.1 indexed citations
7.
Jong-Gierveld, J. de, et al.. (2001). Living arrangements of older persons and family support in more developed countries. VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel). 193–217.46 indexed citations
8.
Jong-Gierveld, J. de, et al.. (2001). Je bent jong en je wilt wat ... Patronen van uit huis gaan in 16 Europese landen en in de USA. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 30. 77–100.3 indexed citations
9.
Jong-Gierveld, J. de. (2001). Ouderen in Europa. 8(5). 20–21.1 indexed citations
10.
Jong-Gierveld, J. de. (1999). Eenzaamheid onder ouderen: Een overzicht van het onderzoek. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1(1). 5–15.4 indexed citations
11.
Jong-Gierveld, J. de, et al.. (1998). Huwelijksgeschiedenissen en informele en formele hulp aan ouderen [Marital histories and informal and formal help received by older adults]. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 35–61.1 indexed citations
12.
Liefbroer, Aart C., Martine Corijn, & J. de Jong-Gierveld. (1996). Similarity and diversity in the start of the family formation process in low countries. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).2 indexed citations
13.
Jong-Gierveld, J. de, Aart C. Liefbroer, & E. Beekink. (1991). De invloed van materiële en immateriële ouderlijke hulpbronnen op het verlaten van het ouderlijk huis. Mens en Maatschappij. 66(1). 25–53.2 indexed citations
14.
Siegers, Jacques J., et al.. (1991). Female labour market behaviour and fertility : a rational-choice approach : proceedings of a workshop organized by the Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NIDI) in collaboration with the Economic Institute, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research on Labour Market and Distribution Issues (CIAV) of Utrecht University held in the Hague, the Netherlands, April 20-22, 1989. Springer eBooks.3 indexed citations
15.
Siegers, Jacques J., J. de Jong-Gierveld, & Evert van Imhoff. (1991). Female Labour Market Behaviour and Fertility: A Rational-Choice Approach.23 indexed citations
Hox, Joop J. & J. de Jong-Gierveld. (1990). Operationalization and research strategy.25 indexed citations
18.
Jong-Gierveld, J. de & T.G. van Tilburg. (1987). The partner as source of social support in problem and non-problem situations. Journal of social behavior and personality. 2. 191–200.35 indexed citations
19.
Jong-Gierveld, J. de, et al.. (1985). The Development of a Rasch-Type Loneliness Scale. Applied Psychological Measurement. 9(3). 289–299.977 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Jong-Gierveld, J. de, et al.. (1980). Singlehood. Journal of Family and Economic Issues. 3(3). 350–368.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.