J Brush

537 total citations
13 papers, 363 citations indexed

About

J Brush is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, J Brush has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 363 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 6 papers in Surgery and 4 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in J Brush's work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (3 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (2 papers) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers). J Brush is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (3 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (2 papers) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers). J Brush collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. J Brush's co-authors include Michael B. Streiff, Trevor Baglin, G A Lammie, R. J. Sellar, A. Gregor, Donald A. Collie, I.H. Kunkler, Robert Leonard, Richard A. Grant and Andrew G. Renehan and has published in prestigious journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, BMJ and British journal of surgery.

In The Last Decade

J Brush

13 papers receiving 355 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
J Brush United Kingdom 8 138 137 114 97 74 13 363
Dominik Schramm Germany 10 82 0.6× 123 0.9× 95 0.8× 91 0.9× 142 1.9× 27 370
Norihiko Yoshimura Japan 15 167 1.2× 141 1.0× 38 0.3× 65 0.7× 198 2.7× 48 530
Gregory Dubel United States 13 175 1.3× 191 1.4× 49 0.4× 35 0.4× 15 0.2× 27 402
Marie‐Anne Collignon France 7 78 0.6× 183 1.3× 228 2.0× 53 0.5× 63 0.9× 11 436
J Clavier France 10 66 0.5× 243 1.8× 159 1.4× 194 2.0× 25 0.3× 33 472
Rolf‐Peter Spielmann Germany 9 112 0.8× 151 1.1× 35 0.3× 52 0.5× 63 0.9× 12 360
Joachim Yahalom United States 7 118 0.9× 128 0.9× 116 1.0× 68 0.7× 20 0.3× 12 405
Flavio Castañeda United States 11 271 2.0× 278 2.0× 158 1.4× 14 0.1× 35 0.5× 42 517
Hilary Moss United Kingdom 7 64 0.5× 202 1.5× 51 0.4× 45 0.5× 63 0.9× 11 379
Do Yun Lee South Korea 20 404 2.9× 288 2.1× 56 0.5× 61 0.6× 47 0.6× 36 772

Countries citing papers authored by J Brush

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J Brush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J Brush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J Brush more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J Brush

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J Brush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J Brush. The network helps show where J Brush may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J Brush

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J Brush. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J Brush based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J Brush. J Brush is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Trail, Matthew, James P. Blackmur, Abhishek Sharma, et al.. (2022). Diagnostic evaluation of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: can we safely omit diagnostic ureteroscopy?. British Journal of Urology. 131(6). 755–762. 4 indexed citations
3.
Brush, J, et al.. (2017). Pitfalls in positron emission tomography. BMJ. j3805–j3805. 1 indexed citations
5.
Gallagher, Kevin, Daniel W. Good, J Brush, Ammar Alhasso, & Grant D. Stewart. (2013). Small bowel injury after suprapubic catheter insertion presenting 3 years after initial insertion. BMJ Case Reports. 2013. bcr2013201436–bcr2013201436. 8 indexed citations
6.
Crawford, Fay, Heather McIntosh, Marshall Dozier, et al.. (2012). FDG PET-CT imaging for pre operative staging in patients with colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 4 indexed citations
7.
Brush, J, Kathleen Boyd, Francesca M. Chappell, et al.. (2011). The value of FDG positron emission tomography/computerised tomography (PET/CT) in pre-operative staging of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.. Health Technology Assessment. 15(35). 1–192, iii. 85 indexed citations
8.
Elsberger, Beatrix, et al.. (2007). Self‐expanding metallic stent insertion in the proximal colon. Colorectal Disease. 10(2). 194–196. 18 indexed citations
9.
Baglin, Trevor, J Brush, & Michael B. Streiff. (2006). Guidelines on use of vena cava filters. British Journal of Haematology. 134(6). 590–595. 125 indexed citations
10.
Stewart, Laurence & J Brush. (2002). Magnetic resonance imaging for urinary incontinence. Current Opinion in Urology. 12(2). 133–136. 3 indexed citations
11.
Shand, Alan G., et al.. (2002). Expandable metallic stents for palliation of malignant pyloric and duodenal obstruction. British journal of surgery. 89(3). 349–350. 10 indexed citations
12.
Brush, J. (2001). Positron emission tomography in urological malignancy. Current Opinion in Urology. 11(2). 175–179. 17 indexed citations
13.
Collie, Donald A., J Brush, G A Lammie, et al.. (1999). Imaging features of leptomeningeal metastases. Clinical Radiology. 54(11). 765–771. 75 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026