J. Blake Scott

24 papers receiving 402 citations

Peers

J. Blake Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • Rheumatology 188
  • Literature and Literary Theory 86
  • Human-Computer Interaction 31
  • Clinical Biochemistry 34
  • Communication 31
Replace Margaret Rose with:
Margaret Rose Australia
Jennifer L. Cohen United States
Ari Y. Kelman United States
Federico de Luca Italy
Douglas Cameron United Kingdom
Jan‐Ola Östman Sweden
Ian Robertson United Kingdom
Anna Camps Spain
Peggy Albers United States
Stéphanie Fox Canada
J. Blake Scott relative to Margaret Rose Australia Margaret Rose's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.1×
Margaret Rose · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. Blake Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Blake Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Blake Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Blake Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Blake Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Blake Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Blake Scott. The network helps show where J. Blake Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside J. Blake Scott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. Blake Scott Line = papers co-authored together J. Blake Scott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998176
2 200456
3 200855
4 200626
5 200420
6 200515
7 200513
8 200311
9 199511
10 199710
11 20099
12 20026
13
Writing and Rhetoric Majors, Disciplinarity, and "Techne".
20175
14 20205
15 20045
16 20144
17 20203
18 20183
19 20212
20 20032

About J. Blake Scott

J. Blake Scott is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Literature and Literary Theory, Education, Philosophy and Rheumatology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 441 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rhetoric and Communication Studies (4 papers), Foucault, Power, and Ethics (3 papers), Service-Learning and Community Engagement (3 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (3 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (3 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (2 papers), Digital Storytelling and Education (2 papers) and Esophageal and GI Pathology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rheumatology (188 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (86 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (31 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (34 citations) and Communication (31 citations). J. Blake Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Ann Bowron, D. Stansbie, Viviane Nicaud, Steve E. Humphries, Vilmundur Guðnason, Bernadette Longo, Lisa Melonçon, Asim Alam, Andrew Beckett and Christa Cook. Their work appears in journals such as Technical Communication Quarterly, College English, Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine, Rhetoric Society Quarterly and Journal of Business and Technical Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact