Megan Stoltz

14 total papers · 719 total citations
10 papers, 480 citations indexed

About

Megan Stoltz is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Megan Stoltz has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 480 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 7 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 3 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Megan Stoltz's work include Crime Patterns and Interventions (8 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (7 papers) and Regulation and Compliance Studies (3 papers). Megan Stoltz is often cited by papers focused on Crime Patterns and Interventions (8 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (7 papers) and Regulation and Compliance Studies (3 papers). Megan Stoltz collaborates with scholars based in United States and Australia. Megan Stoltz's co-authors include Cynthia Lum, Christopher S. Koper, J. Amber Scherer, Angela Higginson, Lorraine Mazerolle, David B. Wilson, Elizabeth Eggins, William F. Johnson, Xiaoyun Wu and Jodi A. Quas and has published in prestigious journals such as Justice Quarterly, Criminology & Public Policy and Police Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

Megan Stoltz

10 papers receiving 457 citations

Hit Papers

Research on body‐worn cam... 2019 2026 2021 2023 2019 50 100 150 200

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Megan Stoltz 377 358 120 54 52 10 480
Ryan Henderson 378 1.0× 376 1.1× 149 1.2× 66 1.2× 35 0.7× 6 476
Josh Young 415 1.1× 432 1.2× 147 1.2× 72 1.3× 42 0.8× 7 525
William H. Sousa 420 1.1× 339 0.9× 123 1.0× 57 1.1× 34 0.7× 19 515
Brian Reaves 295 0.8× 292 0.8× 146 1.2× 36 0.7× 90 1.7× 13 442
David Choate 363 1.0× 320 0.9× 134 1.1× 66 1.2× 51 1.0× 15 484
Practices 456 1.2× 353 1.0× 102 0.8× 33 0.6× 34 0.7× 6 538
Kathleen J. Frydl 472 1.3× 352 1.0× 101 0.8× 32 0.6× 35 0.7× 6 550
Jennifer Calnon Cherkauskas 444 1.2× 399 1.1× 183 1.5× 17 0.3× 31 0.6× 7 487
Paul Drover 405 1.1× 419 1.2× 147 1.2× 70 1.3× 40 0.8× 5 494
Larry T. Hoover 336 0.9× 248 0.7× 86 0.7× 26 0.5× 39 0.8× 30 460

Countries citing papers authored by Megan Stoltz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Megan Stoltz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Megan Stoltz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Megan Stoltz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Megan Stoltz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Megan Stoltz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Megan Stoltz. The network helps show where Megan Stoltz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Megan Stoltz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Megan Stoltz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Megan Stoltz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Megan Stoltz. Megan Stoltz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026