Izumi Ojima
-
- Black Holes and Theoretical Physics 15
- Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions 9
-
- Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories 11
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 11
- Mathematical Physics top 5%
- Advanced Operator Algebra Research 8
-
- Quantum Mechanics and Applications 22
- Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect 8
-
- Quantum Information and Cryptography 8
In The Last Decade
Izumi Ojima
57 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.6k
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 748
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 540
- Mathematical Physics 213
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 688
Countries citing papers authored by Izumi Ojima
This map shows the geographic impact of Izumi Ojima's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Izumi Ojima with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Izumi Ojima more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Izumi Ojima
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Izumi Ojima. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Izumi Ojima. The network helps show where Izumi Ojima may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Izumi Ojima, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 9 | NOTES ON THE KRUPA-ZAWISZA ULTRAPOWER OF SELF-ADJOINT OPERATORS | 2014 | 1 |
| 10 | 2007 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 8 | |
| 12 | 2003 | 2 | |
| 13 | Thermodynamic Properties of Non-Equilibrium States in Quantum Field Theory | 2001 | 22 |
| 14 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1997 | 21 | |
| 16 | On the problem of defining a specific theory within the frame of local quantum physics | 1996 | 4 |
| 17 | 1990 | 209 | |
| 18 | 1986 | 24 | |
| 19 | 1984 | 22 | |
| 20 | Local Covariant Operator Formalism of Non-Abelian Gauge Theories and Quark Confinement Problembreakdown → | 1979 | 756 |
About Izumi Ojima
Izumi Ojima is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Mathematical Physics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics, having authored 61 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Mechanics and Applications (22 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (15 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (11 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (11 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (9 papers), Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect (8 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (8 papers) and Advanced Operator Algebra Research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.6k citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (748 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (540 citations). Izumi Ojima has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Taichiro Kugo, Noboru Nakanishi, H. Umezawa, H. Matsumoto, T. Yanagida, Detlev Buchholz, Hayato Saigo, Huzihiro Araki, Hiroshi Hasegawa and Mitsuhisa Ichiyanagi. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, PLoS ONE and Nuclear Physics B.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.