Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Barygenesis without grand unification
19862.4k citationsM. Fukugita, T. YanagidaPhysics Letters Bprofile →
Is theρMeson a Dynamical Gauge Boson of Hidden Local Symmetry?
1985641 citationsT. Yanagida et al.Physical Review Lettersprofile →
Horizontal Symmetry and Masses of Neutrinos
1980504 citationsT. YanagidaProgress of Theoretical Physicsprofile →
Upper Bound of the Lightest Higgs Boson Mass in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model
1991388 citationsT. Yanagida et al.Progress of Theoretical Physicsprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of T. Yanagida's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Yanagida with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Yanagida more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Yanagida. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Yanagida. The network helps show where T. Yanagida may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of T. Yanagida
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of T. Yanagida.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of T. Yanagida based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with T. Yanagida. T. Yanagida is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ibe, M., et al.. (2005). Realization of minimal supergravity. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 71(3).13 indexed citations
Fujii, Masaaki, Koichi Hamaguchi, & T. Yanagida. (2002). Leptogenesis via theLHuflat direction with a gaugedU(1)B−L. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 65(4).10 indexed citations
5.
Watari, Taizan & T. Yanagida. (2001). Supersymmetric Grand Unification Model with the Orbifold Symmetry Breaking in the Six Dimensional Supergravity.8 indexed citations
6.
Fujii, Masaaki, Koichi Hamaguchi, & T. Yanagida. (2001). Affleck-Dine baryogenesis and leptogenesis with a gaugedU(1)B−L. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 64(12).19 indexed citations
7.
Nomura, Yasunori, Taizan Watari, & T. Yanagida. (2000). Quintessence Axion Potential Induced by Electroweak Instanton Effects.31 indexed citations
8.
Asaka, T., Koichi Hamaguchi, Masahiro Kawasaki, & T. Yanagida. (1999). Leptogenesis in inflaton decay. Physics Letters B. 464(1-2). 12–18.174 indexed citations
9.
Buchmüller, W. & T. Yanagida. (1998). QUARK LEPTON MASS HIERARCHIES AND THE BARYON ASYMMETRY.72 indexed citations
Nomura, Yasunori, Kazuhiro Tobe, & T. Yanagida. (1997). A Gauge Mediation Model of Dynamical Supersymmetry Breaking without Color Instability.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.