Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Using Ant Colony System to Consolidate VMs for Green Cloud Computing
2014249 citationsAdnan Ashraf, Iván Porres et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Iván Porres's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Iván Porres with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Iván Porres more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Iván Porres. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Iván Porres. The network helps show where Iván Porres may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Iván Porres
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Iván Porres.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Iván Porres based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Iván Porres. Iván Porres is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ashraf, Adnan, et al.. (2016). On Optimization of Test Parallelization with Constraints. Åbo Akademi University Research Portal. 164–171.1 indexed citations
8.
Pérez, Beatriz & Iván Porres. (2014). An Overall Framework for Reasoning About UML/OCL Models Based on Constraint Logic Programming and MDA. 7. 370–380.3 indexed citations
9.
Pérez, Beatriz & Iván Porres. (2013). Reasoning about UML/OCL Models using Constraint Logic Programming and MDA. International Conference on Software Engineering Advances. 228–233.4 indexed citations
Porres, Iván, et al.. (2009). Basic Operations Over Models Containing Subset and Union Properties.1 indexed citations
12.
Porres, Iván, et al.. (2007). Development of an Ubiquitous Decision Support System for Clinical Guidelines using MDA.. RIUR (Universidad de La Rioja).7 indexed citations
Lilius, Johan, et al.. (2005). An architecture exploration environment for system on chip design. Nordic journal of computing. 12(4). 361–378.3 indexed citations
15.
Porres, Iván, et al.. (2005). Comparison of modeling frameworks for software engineering. Nordic journal of computing. 12(4). 321–342.2 indexed citations
16.
Porres, Iván, et al.. (2005). Subset and union properties in modeling languages.2 indexed citations
17.
Back, Ralph‐Johan, et al.. (2001). Continuous action systems as a model for hybrid systems. Nordic journal of computing. 8(1). 2–21.12 indexed citations
18.
Porres, Iván, et al.. (2000). Generalizing Action Systems to Hybrid Systems. Åbo Akademi University Research Portal.1 indexed citations
Lilius, Johan, et al.. (1991). A Unified Approach to Code Generation from Behavioral Diagrams.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.