Ivan Chompalov

866 total citations
11 papers, 571 citations indexed

About

Ivan Chompalov is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Sociology and Political Science and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Ivan Chompalov has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 571 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Ivan Chompalov's work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (5 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers) and Complex Systems and Decision Making (2 papers). Ivan Chompalov is often cited by papers focused on scientometrics and bibliometrics research (5 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers) and Complex Systems and Decision Making (2 papers). Ivan Chompalov collaborates with scholars based in United States. Ivan Chompalov's co-authors include Wesley Shrum, Joel Genuth, Barry Bozeman, James S. Dietz, Jong‐Won Park and Juan D. Rogers and has published in prestigious journals such as Research Policy, Scientometrics and Social Studies of Science.

In The Last Decade

Ivan Chompalov

10 papers receiving 485 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ivan Chompalov United States	8	187	116	110	102	86	11	571
Göran Melin Sweden	8	306 1.6×	105 0.9×	125 1.1×	60 0.6×	74 0.9×	17	626
Joel Genuth United States	5	123 0.7×	76 0.7×	91 0.8×	92 0.9×	67 0.8×	5	392
Travis A. Whetsell United States	10	182 1.0×	107 0.9×	94 0.9×	47 0.5×	38 0.4×	26	495
Kamau Bobb United States	5	194 1.0×	112 1.0×	53 0.5×	238 2.3×	75 0.9×	9	582
Ali Gazni Iran	13	393 2.1×	65 0.6×	80 0.7×	63 0.6×	46 0.5×	21	705
Franz Barjak Switzerland	11	186 1.0×	76 0.7×	66 0.6×	38 0.4×	36 0.4×	31	481
Luka Kronegger Slovenia	13	206 1.1×	92 0.8×	109 1.0×	41 0.4×	31 0.4×	24	613
Taryn L. Stanko United States	7	98 0.5×	224 1.9×	82 0.7×	124 1.2×	73 0.8×	11	555
G. Melin Sweden	5	275 1.5×	70 0.6×	113 1.0×	23 0.2×	49 0.6×	6	557
Thomas Franssen Netherlands	13	262 1.4×	199 1.7×	43 0.4×	79 0.8×	32 0.4×	27	722

Countries citing papers authored by Ivan Chompalov

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ivan Chompalov's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ivan Chompalov with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ivan Chompalov more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ivan Chompalov

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ivan Chompalov. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ivan Chompalov. The network helps show where Ivan Chompalov may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ivan Chompalov

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ivan Chompalov. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ivan Chompalov based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ivan Chompalov. Ivan Chompalov is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Chompalov, Ivan, et al.. (2021). Positivist Misconceptions of Science and the Search for Viable Solutions. European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. 7(1). 89–104.

2.

Chompalov, Ivan, et al.. (2014). Sociology of science and the turn to social constructivism. The Social Sciences. 3(2). 59. 4 indexed citations

3.

Chompalov, Ivan, et al.. (2012). Crossing Over: The Interdisciplinary Meaning of Behavior Setting Theory. 23 indexed citations

4.

Shrum, Wesley, Joel Genuth, & Ivan Chompalov. (2007). Structures of Scientific Collaboration. The MIT Press eBooks. 173 indexed citations

5.

Chompalov, Ivan. (2006). Birds of Passage: Patterns of Brain Drain from Bulgaria before and after the Transition to Democracy1. 22(2). 41. 1 indexed citations

6.

Chompalov, Ivan, Joel Genuth, & Wesley Shrum. (2002). The organization of scientific collaborations. Research Policy. 31(5). 749–767. 113 indexed citations

7.

Rogers, Juan D., Barry Bozeman, & Ivan Chompalov. (2001). Obstacles and opportunities in the application of network analysis to the evaluation of R&D. Research Evaluation. 10(3). 161–172. 26 indexed citations

8.

Shrum, Wesley, Ivan Chompalov, & Joel Genuth. (2001). Trust, Conflict and Performance in Scientific Collaborations. Social Studies of Science. 31(5). 681–730. 84 indexed citations

9.

Genuth, Joel, Ivan Chompalov, & Wesley Shrum. (2000). How Experiments Begin: The Formation of Scientific Collaborations. Minerva. 38(3). 311–348. 13 indexed citations

10.

Dietz, James S., et al.. (2000). Using the Curriculum Vita to Study the Career Paths of Scientists and Engineers: An Exploratory Assessment. Scientometrics. 49(3). 419–442. 98 indexed citations

11.

Chompalov, Ivan & Wesley Shrum. (1999). Institutional Collaboration in Science: A Typology of Technological Practice. Science Technology & Human Values. 24(3). 338–372. 36 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact