Iva Lloyd

32 papers receiving 551 citations

Peers

Iva Lloyd
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Ophthalmology 129
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 24
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 77
  • Physiology 151
  • Rheumatology 66
Replace Marion M. Brands with:
Marion M. Brands Netherlands
Lorenzo Caruso Italy
Sa Tang Japan
Megan Prunty United States
Sandra Peternel Croatia
Jennifer A. Wong United States
Shigeruko Iijima Japan
William J. Chapin United States
Sara Fleming United States
Iva Lloyd relative to Marion M. Brands Netherlands Marion M. Brands's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Marion M. Brands · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Iva Lloyd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Iva Lloyd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Iva Lloyd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Iva Lloyd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Iva Lloyd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Iva Lloyd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Iva Lloyd. The network helps show where Iva Lloyd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Iva Lloyd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Iva Lloyd Line = papers co-authored together Iva Lloyd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006192
2 201746
3 201940
4 201930
5 202030
6 201724
7 198923
8 202320
9 201520
10 199118
11 202116
12 201014
13 200013
14 202110
15 201510
16 20208
17 20157
18 20057
19 20216
20 20235

About Iva Lloyd

Iva Lloyd is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Complementary and alternative medicine, Molecular Biology, Epidemiology and General Health Professions, having authored 40 papers that have together received 574 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (12 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (5 papers), Therapeutic Uses of Natural Elements (5 papers), Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (5 papers), Ocular Disorders and Treatments (4 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (3 papers), Connexins and lens biology (3 papers) and Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (129 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (24 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (77 citations), Physiology (151 citations) and Rheumatology (66 citations). Iva Lloyd has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Susmito Biswas, Jane Ashworth, Ed Wraith, Amie Steel, Jon Wardle, Jill Clayton‐Smith, Graeme C. Black, Jamie M. Ellingford, J L Noble and Brian Leatherbarrow. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus, Eye, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and British Journal of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact