I-Sheng Yang

1.0k total citations
35 papers, 639 citations indexed

About

I-Sheng Yang is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, I-Sheng Yang has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 639 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 25 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 11 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in I-Sheng Yang's work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (24 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (23 papers) and Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (6 papers). I-Sheng Yang is often cited by papers focused on Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (24 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (23 papers) and Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (6 papers). I-Sheng Yang collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. I-Sheng Yang's co-authors include Raphael Bousso, Ben Freivogel, Eugene A. Lim, Lam Hui, John T. Giblin, Ue‐Li Pen, Mustafa A. Amin, Robert Main, M. H. van Kerkwijk and Dongzi Li and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Physical Review Letters and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

In The Last Decade

I-Sheng Yang

35 papers receiving 616 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
I-Sheng Yang United States 16 561 446 162 115 29 35 639
Laura Mersini–Houghton United States 16 837 1.5× 680 1.5× 199 1.2× 112 1.0× 12 0.4× 44 892
Ben Freivogel Netherlands 18 860 1.5× 798 1.8× 319 2.0× 125 1.1× 43 1.5× 39 933
H. P. de Oliveira Brazil 15 642 1.1× 537 1.2× 273 1.7× 83 0.7× 11 0.4× 77 759
Sergei Winitzki Germany 10 583 1.0× 470 1.1× 160 1.0× 192 1.7× 10 0.3× 16 663
A. G. Panin Russia 13 546 1.0× 545 1.2× 91 0.6× 149 1.3× 13 0.4× 23 677
Zygmunt Lalak Poland 21 1.2k 2.1× 1.3k 2.8× 202 1.2× 54 0.5× 16 0.6× 80 1.4k
Jeff Murugan South Africa 14 546 1.0× 578 1.3× 346 2.1× 183 1.6× 23 0.8× 44 793
Roman V. Buniy United States 13 354 0.6× 370 0.8× 98 0.6× 85 0.7× 22 0.8× 32 543
Xin-He Meng China 21 1.2k 2.1× 995 2.2× 169 1.0× 50 0.4× 12 0.4× 65 1.2k
Martin Bucher United Kingdom 15 929 1.7× 690 1.5× 113 0.7× 92 0.8× 7 0.2× 25 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by I-Sheng Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I-Sheng Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I-Sheng Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I-Sheng Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I-Sheng Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I-Sheng Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I-Sheng Yang. The network helps show where I-Sheng Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of I-Sheng Yang

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of I-Sheng Yang. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of I-Sheng Yang based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with I-Sheng Yang. I-Sheng Yang is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Li, Dongzi, et al.. (2019). Constraining magnetic fields through plasma lensing: application to the Black Widow pulsar. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 484(4). 5723–5733. 23 indexed citations
2.
Main, Robert, I-Sheng Yang, V. Chan, et al.. (2018). Pulsar emission amplified and resolved by plasma lensing in an eclipsing binary. Nature. 557(7706). 522–525. 53 indexed citations
3.
Pen, Ue‐Li, Xin Wang, & I-Sheng Yang. (2017). Gravitational rotation of polarization: Clarifying the gauge dependence and prediction for a double pulsar. Physical review. D. 95(4). 1 indexed citations
4.
Yang, I-Sheng. (2015). Missing top of the AdS resonance structure. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 91(6). 24 indexed citations
5.
Freivogel, Ben, et al.. (2015). Geometry of the infalling causal patch. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 91(4). 5 indexed citations
6.
Yang, I-Sheng, et al.. (2014). Causal patch complementarity: The inside story for old black holes. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 89(4). 10 indexed citations
7.
Yang, I-Sheng, et al.. (2014). Energy carries information. International Journal of Modern Physics A. 29(20). 1450115–1450115. 7 indexed citations
8.
Amin, Mustafa A., Eugene A. Lim, & I-Sheng Yang. (2013). Clash of Kinks: Phase Shifts in Colliding Nonintegrable Solitons. Physical Review Letters. 111(22). 224101–224101. 13 indexed citations
9.
Yang, I-Sheng. (2013). Recovering the negative mode for type B Coleman–de Luccia instantons. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 87(8). 6 indexed citations
10.
Hui, Lam, Sean T. McWilliams, & I-Sheng Yang. (2013). Binary systems as resonance detectors for gravitational waves. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 87(8). 16 indexed citations
11.
Amin, Mustafa A., Eugene A. Lim, & I-Sheng Yang. (2013). A scattering theory of ultrarelativistic solitons. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 88(10). 12 indexed citations
12.
Yang, I-Sheng. (2012). Strong multifield slowroll condition and spiral inflation. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 85(12). 8 indexed citations
13.
Yang, I-Sheng. (2012). Probability of slowroll inflation in the multiverse. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 86(10). 10 indexed citations
14.
Giblin, John T., et al.. (2012). Classical transitions for flux vacua. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2012(10). 3 indexed citations
15.
Greene, Brian, et al.. (2011). Conifolds and tunneling in the string landscape. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2011(3). 16 indexed citations
16.
Giblin, John T., Lam Hui, Eugene A. Lim, & I-Sheng Yang. (2010). How to run through walls: Dynamics of bubble and soliton collisions. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 82(4). 47 indexed citations
17.
Bousso, Raphael & I-Sheng Yang. (2009). Global-local duality in eternal inflation. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 80(12). 25 indexed citations
18.
Bousso, Raphael, Ben Freivogel, & I-Sheng Yang. (2008). Boltzmann babies in the proper time measure. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 77(10). 45 indexed citations
19.
Bousso, Raphael, Ben Freivogel, Yasuhiro Sekino, et al.. (2008). Future foam: Nontrivial topology from bubble collisions in eternal inflation. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 78(6). 17 indexed citations
20.
Bousso, Raphael, Ben Freivogel, & I-Sheng Yang. (2006). Eternal inflation: The inside story. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 74(10). 65 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026