Eugene A. Lim
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 1%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 1%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 2%
- Oceanography top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Co-authors
- Richard EastherSean M. CarrollJohn T. GiblinPeter AdsheadCristian Armendariz-PiconJosu C. AurrekoetxeaKaty CloughIgnacy Sawicki
- Topics
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (41 papers)Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (22 papers)Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (18 papers)
- Journals
- Physical Review LettersSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSingapore
In The Last Decade
Eugene A. Lim
55 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.9k
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 1.3k
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 351
- Oceanography 173
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 165
Countries citing papers authored by Eugene A. Lim
This map shows the geographic impact of Eugene A. Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eugene A. Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eugene A. Lim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eugene A. Lim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eugene A. Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eugene A. Lim. The network helps show where Eugene A. Lim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eugene A. Lim
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eugene A. Lim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eugene A. Lim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eugene A. Lim. Eugene A. Lim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 34 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | Higher derivative theories with constraints: A strengthening of Ostrogradski's Theorem | 1 |
| 17 | 91 | |
| 18 | 47 | |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | 152 |
About Eugene A. Lim
Eugene A. Lim is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Oceanography, having authored 62 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (41 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (22 papers) and Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.9k citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (1.3k citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (351 citations). Eugene A. Lim has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Richard Easther, Sean M. Carroll, John T. Giblin, Peter Adshead, Cristian Armendariz-Picon, Josu C. Aurrekoetxea, Katy Clough, Ignacy Sawicki, Alexander Vikman and Thomas Helfer. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.