Isabelle Vanhoutte
- Plant Science top 2%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Insect Science top 10%
- Biotechnology
- Co-authors
- Eugenia RussinovaMiroslava ZhiponovaCamilla BettiDirk InzéClaudia JonakSjef BoerenGustavo E. GudesblatSacco C. de Vries
- Topics
- Plant Molecular Biology Research (11 papers)Plant Reproductive Biology (10 papers)Nematode management and characterization studies (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Isabelle Vanhoutte
18 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Plant Science 1.4k
- Molecular Biology 1.0k
- Cell Biology 110
- Insect Science 65
- Biotechnology 38
Countries citing papers authored by Isabelle Vanhoutte
This map shows the geographic impact of Isabelle Vanhoutte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Isabelle Vanhoutte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Isabelle Vanhoutte more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Isabelle Vanhoutte
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Isabelle Vanhoutte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Isabelle Vanhoutte. The network helps show where Isabelle Vanhoutte may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Isabelle Vanhoutte
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Isabelle Vanhoutte. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Isabelle Vanhoutte based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Isabelle Vanhoutte. Isabelle Vanhoutte is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | |
| 2 | Brassinosteroid gene regulatory networks at cellular resolution in the Arabidopsis rootbreakdown → | 86 |
| 3 | 88 | |
| 4 | 27 | |
| 5 | 119 | |
| 6 | 134 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 56 | |
| 9 | 147 | |
| 10 | 260 | |
| 11 | 149 | |
| 12 | 219 | |
| 13 | 38 | |
| 14 | 118 | |
| 15 | 70 | |
| 16 | 26 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | Characterisation of proteins secreted by the plant-parasitic nematode Heterodera schachtii. | 1 |
About Isabelle Vanhoutte
Isabelle Vanhoutte is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Cell Biology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Molecular Biology Research (11 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (10 papers) and Nematode management and characterization studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (1.4k citations), Molecular Biology (1.0k citations) and Cell Biology (110 citations). Isabelle Vanhoutte has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Eugenia Russinova, Miroslava Zhiponova, Camilla Betti, Dirk Inzé, Claudia Jonak, Sjef Boeren, Gustavo E. Gudesblat, Sacco C. de Vries, Walter Van Dongen and Gerrit T.S. Beemster. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.