Irving Crespi

732 citations
31 papers · 489 indexed · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Irving Crespi

22 papers receiving 361 citations

Peers

Irving Crespi
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Communication 124
  • Political Science and International Relations 229
  • General Decision Sciences 13
  • Marketing 41
  • Sociology and Political Science 193
Replace Stanley Kelley with:
Stanley Kelley United States
Thad W. Mirer United States
Robert H. Ferrell United States
Robert E. Babe Canada
Susumu Shikano Germany
Lisa Hill Australia
Kjersten Nelson United States
Amy Fried United States
Donna Bahry United States
Miroslav Nincic United States
Irving Crespi relative to Stanley Kelley United States Stanley Kelley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Stanley Kelley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Irving Crespi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Irving Crespi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Irving Crespi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Irving Crespi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Irving Crespi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Irving Crespi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Irving Crespi. The network helps show where Irving Crespi may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Irving Crespi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Irving Crespi Line = papers co-authored together Irving Crespi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20132
2
El proceso de opinión pública: cómo habla la gente
20000
3 199133
4 199080
5
19890
6 19871
7 197715
8 19775
9 197669
10 19750
11
Polls, television, and the new politics
197055
12
Attitude research on the rocks
196826
13 19680
14 19650
15 19641
16 19642
17 196118
18 19616
19 19568
20 19520

About Irving Crespi

Irving Crespi is a scholar working on General Social Sciences, Linguistics and Language, Political Science and International Relations, Statistics and Probability and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 31 papers that have together received 489 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Academic Freedom and Politics (1 paper), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 paper), Urban Planning and Landscape Design (1 paper), Landscape and Cultural Studies (1 paper), Game Theory and Voting Systems (1 paper), Gambling Behavior and Treatments (1 paper), Social Sciences and Policies (1 paper) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (124 citations), Political Science and International Relations (229 citations), General Decision Sciences (13 citations), Marketing (41 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (193 citations). Irving Crespi has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and China. Frequent co-authors include Seymour Sudman, Harold Mendelsohn, Iain McLean, Kurt Lang, Lee P. Adler, Benjamin Ginsberg, Martin Shefter, Vladimir Shlapentokh, Paul B. Sheatsley and Richard A. Brody. Their work appears in journals such as Public Opinion Quarterly, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of Marketing and The Journal of Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026