Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Towards a theory of transformative social innovation: A relational framework and 12 propositions
2020181 citationsBonno Pel, Alex Haxeltine et al.Research Policyprofile →
Inner transformation to sustainability as a deep leverage point: fostering new avenues for change through dialogue and reflection
2021144 citationsC Woiwode, Niko Schäpke et al.Sustainability Scienceprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Iris Kunze's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Iris Kunze with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Iris Kunze more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Iris Kunze. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Iris Kunze. The network helps show where Iris Kunze may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Iris Kunze
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Iris Kunze.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Iris Kunze based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Iris Kunze. Iris Kunze is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Woiwode, C, Niko Schäpke, Olívia Bina, et al.. (2021). Inner transformation to sustainability as a deep leverage point: fostering new avenues for change through dialogue and reflection. Sustainability Science. 16(3). 841–858.144 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Pel, Bonno, Alex Haxeltine, Flor Avelino, et al.. (2020). Towards a theory of transformative social innovation: A relational framework and 12 propositions. Research Policy. 49(8). 104080–104080.181 indexed citations breakdown →
Pel, Bonno, Adina Dumitru, René Kemp, et al.. (2017). Synthesis report: meta-analysis of Critical Turning Points in TSI: Deliverable D5.4. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles).3 indexed citations
Haxeltine, Alex, Bonno Pel, Adina Dumitru, et al.. (2017). Towards a TSI theory: a relational framework and 12 propositions. VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet).20 indexed citations
Avelino, Flor, Noel Longhurst, Julia M. Wittmayer, et al.. (2015). Transition towards 'New Economies'? A Transformative Social Innovation Perspective. VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet).7 indexed citations
12.
Avelino, Flor, Adina Dumitru, Noel Longhurst, et al.. (2015). Transitions towards new economies? A transformative social innovation perspective: TRANSIT working paper 3. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles).6 indexed citations
13.
Wittmayer, Julia M., Julia Backhaus, Flor Avelino, et al.. (2015). Narratives of change:: how social innovation initiatives engage with their transformative ambitions. Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles).11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.