Irene López‐Gómez
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Co-authors
- Carmelo VázquezGonzalo HervásCovadonga ChavesIván BlancoCecilia PeñacobaCarmen ÉcijaPatricia CataláAlmudena Duque
- Topics
- Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (6 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (6 papers)Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited States
In The Last Decade
Irene López‐Gómez
16 papers receiving 331 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Clinical Psychology 165
- Social Psychology 158
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 131
- Applied Psychology 70
- Psychiatry and Mental health 62
Countries citing papers authored by Irene López‐Gómez
This map shows the geographic impact of Irene López‐Gómez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Irene López‐Gómez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Irene López‐Gómez more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Irene López‐Gómez
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Irene López‐Gómez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Irene López‐Gómez. The network helps show where Irene López‐Gómez may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Irene López‐Gómez
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Irene López‐Gómez. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Irene López‐Gómez based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Irene López‐Gómez. Irene López‐Gómez is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 27 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 26 | |
| 13 | 120 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | Adaptación de las "Escalas de afecto positivo y negativo" (PANAS) en una muestra general española | 41 |
| 16 | 7 |
About Irene López‐Gómez
Irene López‐Gómez is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 338 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (6 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (6 papers) and Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (70 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (131 citations) and Clinical Psychology (165 citations). Irene López‐Gómez has collaborated with scholars based in Spain and United States. Frequent co-authors include Carmelo Vázquez, Gonzalo Hervás, Covadonga Chaves, Iván Blanco, Cecilia Peñacoba, Carmen Écija, Patricia Catalá, Almudena Duque, Alba Contreras and Lilián Velasco Furlong. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Hazardous Materials and Depression and Anxiety.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.