Frédérick Dionne
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Pharmacology
- Co-authors
- Simon GrégoireLise LachanceThérèse BouffardBassam KhouryTimothy A. PychylJean‐Louis MonestèsWhitney ScottMarie‐Claude Blais
- Topics
- Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (13 papers)Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (7 papers)Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaBehavior TherapyClinical Journal of Pain
- Partner nations
- CanadaFranceUnited States
In The Last Decade
Frédérick Dionne
25 papers receiving 401 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Clinical Psychology 332
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 116
- Social Psychology 102
- General Health Professions 55
- Pharmacology 41
Countries citing papers authored by Frédérick Dionne
This map shows the geographic impact of Frédérick Dionne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frédérick Dionne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frédérick Dionne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frédérick Dionne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frédérick Dionne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frédérick Dionne. The network helps show where Frédérick Dionne may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frédérick Dionne
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frédérick Dionne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frédérick Dionne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frédérick Dionne. Frédérick Dionne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 48 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 88 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 17 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 42 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | Le modèle de la flexibilité psychologique : une approche nouvelle de la santé mentale. | 1 |
| 20 | INTRODUCTION À LA TROISIÈME GÉNÉRATION DE THÉRAPIE COMPORTEMENTALE ET COGNITIVE | 2 |
About Frédérick Dionne
Frédérick Dionne is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pharmacology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 409 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (13 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (7 papers) and Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (332 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (116 citations) and Applied Psychology (31 citations). Frédérick Dionne has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Simon Grégoire, Lise Lachance, Thérèse Bouffard, Bassam Khoury, Timothy A. Pychyl, Jean‐Louis Monestès, Whitney Scott, Marie‐Claude Blais, Ronald D. Rogge and Ilios Kotsou. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Behavior Therapy and Clinical Journal of Pain.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.