Irene Diamond
- Gender Studies top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Geography, Planning and Development top 5%
- Topics
- Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (2 papers)Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (2 papers)Jungian Analytical Psychology (1 paper)
- Cited by
- Gender StudiesGeography, Planning and DevelopmentPolitical Science and International Relations
- Journals
- Contemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsAmerican Political Science ReviewJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Irene Diamond
9 papers receiving 459 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Gender Studies 269
- Sociology and Political Science 249
- Political Science and International Relations 159
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 70
- Geography, Planning and Development 67
Countries citing papers authored by Irene Diamond
This map shows the geographic impact of Irene Diamond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Irene Diamond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Irene Diamond more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Irene Diamond
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Irene Diamond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Irene Diamond. The network helps show where Irene Diamond may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Irene Diamond
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Irene Diamond. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Irene Diamond based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Irene Diamond. Irene Diamond is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | Reweaving the World: The Emergence of Ecofeminism | 296 |
| 4 | 66 | |
| 5 | 39 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 51 | |
| 8 | 32 | |
| 9 | Sex roles in the state house | 159 |
About Irene Diamond
Irene Diamond is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 9 papers that have together received 648 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (2 papers), Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (2 papers) and Jungian Analytical Psychology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (269 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (67 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (159 citations). Irene Diamond has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gloria Feman Orenstein, Nancy C. M. Hartsock, John G.F. Cleland and Judith Stacey. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, American Political Science Review and Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.