Insook Cho

183 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Insook Cho
Comparison fields: 5 of 160
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 235
  • Health Information Management 532
  • Leadership and Management 72
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 215
  • Medical Laboratory Technology 76
Replace Maxim Topaz with:
Maxim Topaz United States
Po‐Yin Yen United States
Peter L. Elkin United States
Julie K. Johnson United States
Lisa Nissen Australia
Douglas S. Bell United States
Heather McDonald Canada
Constance Johnson United States
Deborah Williams United States
Aoife De Brún Ireland
Insook Cho relative to Maxim Topaz United States Maxim Topaz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Maxim Topaz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Insook Cho

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Insook Cho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Insook Cho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Insook Cho more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Insook Cho

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Insook Cho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Insook Cho. The network helps show where Insook Cho may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Insook Cho, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Insook Cho Line = papers co-authored together Insook Cho links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 194 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013170
2 2002107
3 2016106
4 201486
5 200968
6 201363
7 201054
8 201348
9 201244
10 201041
11 201339
12 201639
13 201337
14 201837
15 201736
16 201633
17 201732
18 200632
19 200331
20 201128

About Insook Cho

Insook Cho is a scholar working on Health Information Management, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Plant Science, having authored 194 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electronic Health Records Systems (46 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (35 papers), Health and Wellbeing Research (30 papers), Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies (27 papers), Plant Virus Research Studies (22 papers), Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring (13 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (13 papers) and Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (235 citations), Health Information Management (532 citations), Leadership and Management (72 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (215 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (76 citations). Insook Cho has collaborated with scholars based in South Korea, United States and Ethiopia. Frequent co-authors include David W. Bates, Sarah P. Slight, Diane L. Seger, Karen C. Nanji, Hwasoon Kim, Kelly Bedard, Hyeoun‐Ae Park, Young Whee Lee, Patricia C. Dykes and Julie Fiskio. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Medical Informatics, The Plant Pathology Journal, CIN Computers Informatics Nursing, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association and International Journal of Biological Macromolecules.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact