Mary G. Amato
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 0.2%
- Health Information Management top 0.2%
- Surgery top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Emergency Medical Services top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Henry I. BusseyElaine ChiquetteDavid W. BatesDiane L. SegerGilbert Ramı́rezCynthia D. MulrowMary O’KeefeAdam Wright
- Topics
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (31 papers)Electronic Health Records Systems (22 papers)Patient Safety and Medication Errors (20 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Mary G. Amato
56 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 797
- Health Information Management 501
- Surgery 459
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 424
- Emergency Medical Services 349
Countries citing papers authored by Mary G. Amato
This map shows the geographic impact of Mary G. Amato's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary G. Amato with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary G. Amato more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mary G. Amato
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary G. Amato. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary G. Amato. The network helps show where Mary G. Amato may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary G. Amato
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary G. Amato. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary G. Amato based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary G. Amato. Mary G. Amato is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 42 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 26 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | An Evaluation of Computerized Medication Alert Override Behavior in Ambulatory Care. | 1 |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 52 | |
| 17 | 75 | |
| 18 | 470 | |
| 19 | 136 | |
| 20 | Warfarin for prevention of stroke: A practical, clinical review | 1 |
About Mary G. Amato
Mary G. Amato is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Health Information Management and Medical Terminology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (31 papers), Electronic Health Records Systems (22 papers) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (797 citations), Family Practice (275 citations) and Health Information Management (501 citations). Mary G. Amato has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Henry I. Bussey, Elaine Chiquette, David W. Bates, Diane L. Seger, Gilbert Ramı́rez, Cynthia D. Mulrow, Mary O’Keefe, Adam Wright, Gordon D. Schiff and Adrian Wong. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Care Medicine, Medical Care and Journal of General Internal Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.