Inmaculada Mateo‐Rodríguez
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Pharmacy top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- María del Mar García‐CalventeGracia Maroto‐NavarroNatalia Hidalgo‐RuzzanteMaría del Río‐LozanoEugenia Gil‐GarcíaJorge Marcos‐MarcosLorena Saletti‐CuestaLuis Andrés López-Fernández
- Topics
- Aging, Health, and Disability (6 papers)Health, psychology, and well-being (4 papers)Social Sciences and Policies (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaBMC Public HealthJournal of Epidemiology & Community Health
In The Last Decade
Inmaculada Mateo‐Rodríguez
16 papers receiving 475 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 225
- General Health Professions 180
- Pharmacy 137
- Sociology and Political Science 98
- Health 81
Countries citing papers authored by Inmaculada Mateo‐Rodríguez
This map shows the geographic impact of Inmaculada Mateo‐Rodríguez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inmaculada Mateo‐Rodríguez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inmaculada Mateo‐Rodríguez more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Inmaculada Mateo‐Rodríguez
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inmaculada Mateo‐Rodríguez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inmaculada Mateo‐Rodríguez. The network helps show where Inmaculada Mateo‐Rodríguez may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Inmaculada Mateo‐Rodríguez
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Inmaculada Mateo‐Rodríguez. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Inmaculada Mateo‐Rodríguez based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Inmaculada Mateo‐Rodríguez. Inmaculada Mateo‐Rodríguez is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 41 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | 116 | |
| 13 | 71 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 91 | |
| 16 | 89 |
About Inmaculada Mateo‐Rodríguez
Inmaculada Mateo‐Rodríguez is a scholar working on General Social Sciences, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 16 papers that have together received 503 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aging, Health, and Disability (6 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (4 papers) and Social Sciences and Policies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (137 citations), General Social Sciences (59 citations) and Health (81 citations). Inmaculada Mateo‐Rodríguez has collaborated with scholars based in Spain and Guatemala. Frequent co-authors include María del Mar García‐Calvente, Gracia Maroto‐Navarro, Natalia Hidalgo‐Ruzzante, María del Río‐Lozano, Eugenia Gil‐García, Jorge Marcos‐Marcos, Lorena Saletti‐Cuesta, Luis Andrés López-Fernández, Ana R. Delgado and Juan de Dios Luna. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, BMC Public Health and Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.