Ingmar Gutberlet

1.3k total citations
11 papers, 961 citations indexed

About

Ingmar Gutberlet is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ingmar Gutberlet has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 961 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 3 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 3 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Ingmar Gutberlet's work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers). Ingmar Gutberlet is often cited by papers focused on Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (4 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers). Ingmar Gutberlet collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Ingmar Gutberlet's co-authors include Wolfgang H. R. Miltner, Thomas Weiß, Edmund Wascher, Björn Rasch, Daniel Schneider, Jessica Sänger, Herbert Heuer, Sven Falkenstein Hoffmann, Gerhard Rinkenauer and Holger Hecht and has published in prestigious journals such as NeuroImage, Fertility and Sterility and Psychoneuroendocrinology.

In The Last Decade

Ingmar Gutberlet

11 papers receiving 941 citations

Peers

Ingmar Gutberlet
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 660
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 286
  • Social Psychology 162
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 111
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 86
Replace Sara V. Tupak with:
Sara V. Tupak Germany
Frans Boiten Netherlands
Stephanie Schmidt Germany
Vera Ferrari Italy
Jim M. Monti United States
Savio W.H. Wong Hong Kong
Heidi Jiang United States
Filomeno Cortese Canada
Tracey Wszalek United States
Naho Ichikawa Japan
Sara V. Tupak Germany View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Ingmar Gutberlet
Ingmar Gutberlet · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Ingmar Gutberlet
Ingmar Gutberlet · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Ingmar Gutberlet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ingmar Gutberlet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingmar Gutberlet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingmar Gutberlet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ingmar Gutberlet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingmar Gutberlet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingmar Gutberlet. The network helps show where Ingmar Gutberlet may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ingmar Gutberlet

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ingmar Gutberlet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ingmar Gutberlet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ingmar Gutberlet. Ingmar Gutberlet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 19
2 137
3 313
4 106
5 150
6 51
7 65
8 68
9 48
10 2
11 2

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026