Inge Eidemak
- Nephrology top 1%
- Dialysis and Renal Disease Management 24
- Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes 4
- Emergency Medical Services top 10%
-
- Muscle and Compartmental Disorders 11
-
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues 8
-
- Muscle metabolism and nutrition 6
-
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 6
-
- Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment 4
-
- Chronic Disease Management Strategies 3
- Co-authors
- Stig MølstedSvend StrandgaardBo Feldt‐RasmussenAdrian P. HarrisonInge‐Lis KanstrupJesper L. AndersenJames HeafJens Kristensen
- Journals
- Nephron Clinical Practice (4 papers)BMC Nephrology (2 papers)BioMed Research International (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- DenmarkCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Inge Eidemak
38 papers receiving 730 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Nephrology 466
- Transplantation 18
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 118
- Complementary and alternative medicine 42
- Emergency Medical Services 36
Countries citing papers authored by Inge Eidemak
This map shows the geographic impact of Inge Eidemak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inge Eidemak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inge Eidemak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Inge Eidemak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inge Eidemak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inge Eidemak. The network helps show where Inge Eidemak may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Inge Eidemak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2014 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 37 | |
| 15 | 2010 | 9 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 66 | |
| 17 | 2004 | 65 | |
| 18 | 1995 | 6 | |
| 19 | 1993 | 17 | |
| 20 | 1992 | 17 |
About Inge Eidemak
Inge Eidemak is a scholar working on Nephrology, Family Practice, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Cell Biology and Hematology, having authored 40 papers that have together received 756 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dialysis and Renal Disease Management (24 papers), Muscle and Compartmental Disorders (11 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (8 papers), Muscle metabolism and nutrition (6 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (6 papers), Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (4 papers), Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment (4 papers) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (466 citations), Transplantation (18 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (118 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (42 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (36 citations). Inge Eidemak has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stig Mølsted, Svend Strandgaard, Bo Feldt‐Rasmussen, Adrian P. Harrison, Inge‐Lis Kanstrup, Jesper L. Andersen, James Heaf, Jens Kristensen, Stig Lønberg Nielsen and O. Schmitz. Their work appears in journals such as Nephron Clinical Practice, BMC Nephrology, BioMed Research International, Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation and Diabetologia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.