Inês Mendes

17 papers receiving 253 citations

Peers

Inês Mendes
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Nephrology 67
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 25
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 81
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 35
  • Physiology 57
Replace Nikolaos Fountoulakis with:
Nikolaos Fountoulakis United Kingdom
Keisei Kosaki Japan
Chun‐Ning Ho Taiwan
Jennifer R. Dobratz United States
Atsuhiro Kikuchi Japan
F. Keeling Ireland
Jean François Yale Canada
Bartosz Symonides Poland
P. Spanu Italy
Ondřej Ludka Czechia
Inês Mendes relative to Nikolaos Fountoulakis United Kingdom Nikolaos Fountoulakis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Nikolaos Fountoulakis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Inês Mendes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inês Mendes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inês Mendes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inês Mendes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inês Mendes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inês Mendes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inês Mendes. The network helps show where Inês Mendes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Inês Mendes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Inês Mendes Line = papers co-authored together Inês Mendes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202061
2 201446
3 201640
4 202239
5 202019
6 201516
7 202110
8 20218
9 20154
10 20223
11 20233
12 20163
13 20212
14 20202
15 20172
16 20171
17 20241
18 20221
19 20150
20 20230

About Inês Mendes

Inês Mendes is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology and Surgery, having authored 23 papers that have together received 261 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Congenital Heart Disease Studies (7 papers), Thyroid Disorders and Treatments (3 papers), Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications (2 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (2 papers), Acute Kidney Injury Research (2 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (2 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (2 papers) and Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (67 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (25 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (81 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (35 citations) and Physiology (57 citations). Inês Mendes has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Mario Siervo, Catarina Teixeira, Marta Pereira, Natacha Rodrigues, José António Lopes, John C. Mathers, Rosa Rosario, Oliver M. Shannon, Maria João Melo and Mohsen Mazidi. Their work appears in journals such as Nutrition, Journal of Nutrition, Clinical Kidney Journal, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews and Metals.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact