Inês Lynce

2.8k citations
82 papers · 691 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Inês Lynce

75 papers receiving 640 citations

Peers

Inês Lynce
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Software 136
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 311
  • Computer Networks and Communications 287
  • Artificial Intelligence 331
  • Hardware and Architecture 48
Replace Niklas Sörensson with:
Niklas Sörensson Sweden
Keijo Heljanko Finland
Albert Oliveras Spain
Radu Mateescu France
Robert Nieuwenhuis Spain
Daniel R. Tauritz United States
Irene Finocchi Italy
Lakhdar Saïs France
Christopher Jefferson United Kingdom
Tod Courtney United States
Inês Lynce relative to Niklas Sörensson Sweden Niklas Sörensson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Niklas Sörensson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Inês Lynce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inês Lynce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inês Lynce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inês Lynce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inês Lynce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inês Lynce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inês Lynce. The network helps show where Inês Lynce may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Inês Lynce, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Inês Lynce Line = papers co-authored together Inês Lynce links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 82 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Sudoku as a SAT Problem.
200653
2
On Computing Minimum Unsatisfiable Cores
200451
3
Efficient haplotype inference with boolean satisfiability
200634
4 201232
5 201132
6 201530
7 201229
8 201024
9 200422
10 201017
11 201417
12 200816
13 200915
14 200414
15 202114
16 201814
17 200813
18 200313
19 200112
20 201112

About Inês Lynce

Inês Lynce is a scholar working on Computer Networks and Communications, Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology and Software, having authored 82 papers that have together received 691 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization (28 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (28 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (11 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (9 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (8 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (8 papers), Gene expression and cancer classification (7 papers) and Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (136 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (311 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (287 citations), Artificial Intelligence (331 citations) and Hardware and Architecture (48 citations). Inês Lynce has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Ireland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include João Marques‐Silva, Vasco Manquinho, Joël Ouaknine, Ruben Martins, Josep Argelich, Mikoláš Janota, Arlindo L. Oliveira, Anton Belov, Pedro T. Monteiro and Daniel Le Berre. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Computational Biology, Constraints, Expert Systems with Applications, Journal of Scheduling and Algorithms for Molecular Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact