This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Constraints. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Constraints with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Constraints more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Constraints. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Constraints.
About Constraints
The 472 papers published in Constraints in the last decades have received a total of 6.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Constraints usually cover Computer Networks and Communications (350 papers), Software (45 papers) and Signal Processing (118 papers) specifically the topics of Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization (338 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (112 papers), Scheduling and Timetabling Solutions (58 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (58 papers), Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms (57 papers), AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (45 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (40 papers) and Advanced Database Systems and Queries (39 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Constraints are Mark Wallace, Peter J. Stuckey, John Hooker, Pascal Van Hentenryck, Steven Minton, Ari Jónsson, Jeremy Frank, Matteo Fischetti, Jason Jo and Carmen Gervet.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.