Ines Conrad
- Health top 10%
- Health disparities and outcomes 6
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 8
- Applied Psychology top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Workplace Health and Well-being 8
- Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout 6
- Employment and Welfare Studies 4
-
- Mental Health Treatment and Access 7
-
- School Health and Nursing Education 5
-
- Disability Rights and Representation 4
Ines Conrad
41 papers receiving 463 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 22
- Health 89
- Clinical Psychology 181
- Applied Psychology 38
- General Health Professions 173
Countries citing papers authored by Ines Conrad
This map shows the geographic impact of Ines Conrad's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ines Conrad with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ines Conrad more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ines Conrad
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ines Conrad. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ines Conrad. The network helps show where Ines Conrad may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ines Conrad, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 22 | |
| 13 | 2020 | 48 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 20 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 18 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 19 | WHOQOL-OLD und WHOQOL-BREF | 2016 | 1 |
| 20 | 2014 | 2 |
About Ines Conrad
Ines Conrad is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, General Health Professions and Social Psychology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 476 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Workplace Health and Well-being (8 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (8 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (7 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (6 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (6 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (5 papers), Disability Rights and Representation (4 papers) and Employment and Welfare Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (22 citations), Health (89 citations), Clinical Psychology (181 citations), Applied Psychology (38 citations) and General Health Professions (173 citations). Ines Conrad has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and China. Frequent co-authors include Steffi G. Riedel‐Heller, Felix S. Hussenoeder, Andreas Hinz, Herbert Matschinger, Reinhold Kilian, Heide Glaesmer, Matthias L. Schroeter, Francisca S. Rodriguez, Philipp Yorck Herzberg and Markus Zenger. Their work appears in journals such as Sexuality and Disability, Quality of Life Research, Aging & Mental Health, Psychology Health & Medicine and Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.