Ines Blix

1.0k citations
37 papers · 763 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Ines Blix

33 papers receiving 745 citations

Peers

Ines Blix
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Clinical Psychology 412
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 86
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 79
  • Immunology and Allergy 32
  • Dermatology 44
Replace Colin Wastell with:
Colin Wastell Australia
Antonio Fernández Parra Spain
Sebastian G. Kaplan United States
Khadeeja Munawar Malaysia
Nusret Soylu Türkiye
Eloise C. Neebe United States
Sabina La Grutta Italy
Rosa María Limiñana Gras Spain
Iván Barrios Paraguay
Sabrina Bonichini Italy
Ines Blix relative to Colin Wastell Australia Colin Wastell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.8×
Colin Wastell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ines Blix

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ines Blix's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ines Blix with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ines Blix more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ines Blix

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ines Blix. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ines Blix. The network helps show where Ines Blix may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ines Blix, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ines Blix Line = papers co-authored together Ines Blix links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201475
2 202167
3 201749
4 201644
5 201042
6 201342
7 201339
8 201837
9 201632
10 202126
11 201626
12 201726
13 201425
14 201623
15 201819
16 201418
17 201617
18 201817
19 201615
20 201515

About Ines Blix

Ines Blix is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 763 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (25 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (9 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (5 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (4 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (3 papers) and Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (412 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (86 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (79 citations), Immunology and Allergy (32 citations) and Dermatology (44 citations). Ines Blix has collaborated with scholars based in Norway, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marianne Skogbrott Birkeland, Trond Heir, Øivind Solberg, Siri Thoresen, Marianne Bang Hansen, Tim Brennen, Tore Wentzel‐Larsen, Frode L. Jahnsen, Karl Schenck and Olav Schreurs. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, European journal of psychotraumatology, Applied Cognitive Psychology, Psychological Trauma Theory Research Practice and Policy and Journal of Traumatic Stress.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact