Inês Aniceto

680 citations
18 papers · 383 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Inês Aniceto

17 papers receiving 376 citations

Peers

Inês Aniceto
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 300
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 114
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 146
  • Geometry and Topology 44
  • Marketing 32
Replace Issaku Kanamori with:
Issaku Kanamori Japan
Marco Fazzi Italy
Pedro D. Alvarez Chile
Marieke van Beest United Kingdom
Ethan Torres United States
Max Hübner United States
Marek J. Radzikowski Poland
Soon-Tae Hong South Korea
Arjan Keurentjes Belgium
Inês Aniceto relative to Issaku Kanamori Japan Issaku Kanamori's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Issaku Kanamori · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Inês Aniceto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inês Aniceto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inês Aniceto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inês Aniceto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inês Aniceto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inês Aniceto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inês Aniceto. The network helps show where Inês Aniceto may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Inês Aniceto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Inês Aniceto Line = papers co-authored together Inês Aniceto links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 201474
2 201654
3 201546
4 202334
5 200930
6 201628
7 201026
8 201925
9 201521
10 202110
11 20069
12 20157
13
On integrable boundaries in the 2 dimensional O(N) sigma-models
20176
14 20126
15 20233
16 20252
17 20092
18 20230

About Inês Aniceto

Inês Aniceto is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Geometry and Topology and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 383 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (14 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (6 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (5 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (5 papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (3 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (3 papers), Nonlinear Waves and Solitons (2 papers) and Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (300 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (114 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (146 citations), Geometry and Topology (44 citations) and Marketing (32 citations). Inês Aniceto has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, Portugal and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ricardo Schiappa, Michał Spaliński, Jorge G. Russo, Olof Ohlsson Sax, Cristela Maia Bairrada, Pedro Silva, Filipe Coelho, Jakub Jankowski, Antal Jevicki and Tamás Gombor. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. D, Journal of High Energy Physics, Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical, Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences and Communications in Mathematical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact