419 total citations 22 papers, 75 citations indexed
About
Ine Jacobs is a scholar working on Archeology, History and Classics.
According to data from OpenAlex, Ine Jacobs has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 75 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Archeology, 11 papers in History and 10 papers in Classics. Recurrent topics in Ine Jacobs's work include Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (13 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (11 papers) and Byzantine Studies and History (10 papers). Ine Jacobs is often cited by papers focused on Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (13 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (11 papers) and Byzantine Studies and History (10 papers). Ine Jacobs collaborates with scholars based in Russia, United Kingdom and Canada. Ine Jacobs's co-authors include Marc Waelkens, Lea Stirling, Hannelore Vanhaverbeke, Jeroen Poblome, Eva Kaptijn and Roel Van Beeumen and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Archaeology, The English Historical Review and Journal of Roman Archaeology.
In The Last Decade
Ine Jacobs
18 papers
receiving
56 citations
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Ine Jacobs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ine Jacobs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ine Jacobs more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ine Jacobs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ine Jacobs. The network helps show where Ine Jacobs may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ine Jacobs
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ine Jacobs.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ine Jacobs based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ine Jacobs. Ine Jacobs is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Jacobs, Ine. (2017). Cross Graffiti as Physical Means to Christianize the Classical City: An Exploration of Their Function, Meaning, Topographical, and Socio-Historical Contexts. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).2 indexed citations
Waelkens, Marc, et al.. (2015). The 2013 Excavations and restoration activities at Sagalassos. Lirias (KU Leuven). 35–60.1 indexed citations
8.
Jacobs, Ine & Marc Waelkens. (2014). Five centuries of glory. The Colonnaded Street of Sagalassos in the first and the sixth century AD. Lirias (KU Leuven).1 indexed citations
Jacobs, Ine. (2014). Ecclesiastical dominance and urban setting. Colonnaded streets as back-drop for Christian display.. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford). 263–286.2 indexed citations
11.
Jacobs, Ine. (2014). Production and Prosperity in the Theodosian Period.3 indexed citations
12.
Jacobs, Ine. (2013). Aesthetic Maintenance of Civic Space: The 'Classical' City from the 4th to the 7th c. AD. VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel).8 indexed citations
13.
Jacobs, Ine. (2012). The creation of the Late Antique city. Constantinople and Asia Minor during the “Theodosian renaissance”. Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford).9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.