Ildikó Schwarczinger
- Plant Science top 5%
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Ecology
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Co-authors
- József FodorB. BarnaLóránt KirályGábor GullnerBorbála Dorottya HarrachPatrick SchäferAndrzej SkoczowskiKarl‐Heinz Kogel
- Topics
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (15 papers)Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (12 papers)Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- HungaryEgyptUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ildikó Schwarczinger
29 papers receiving 636 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Plant Science 595
- Cell Biology 148
- Molecular Biology 121
- Ecology 106
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 94
Countries citing papers authored by Ildikó Schwarczinger
This map shows the geographic impact of Ildikó Schwarczinger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ildikó Schwarczinger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ildikó Schwarczinger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ildikó Schwarczinger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ildikó Schwarczinger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ildikó Schwarczinger. The network helps show where Ildikó Schwarczinger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ildikó Schwarczinger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ildikó Schwarczinger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ildikó Schwarczinger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ildikó Schwarczinger. Ildikó Schwarczinger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 22 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 374 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | Fungi causing branch dieback of giant sequoia (Sequoiadendron giganteum (Lindl.) Buchholcz) in Hungary. | 2 |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Ildikó Schwarczinger
Ildikó Schwarczinger is a scholar working on Plant Science, Cell Biology and Ecology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 661 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (15 papers), Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (12 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (595 citations), Cell Biology (148 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (94 citations). Ildikó Schwarczinger has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, Egypt and United States. Frequent co-authors include József Fodor, B. Barna, Lóránt Király, Gábor Gullner, Borbála Dorottya Harrach, Patrick Schäfer, Andrzej Skoczowski, Karl‐Heinz Kogel, Helmut Baltruschat and Anna Janeczko. Their work appears in journals such as New Phytologist, International Journal of Molecular Sciences and Molecules.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.