This map shows the geographic impact of E. Niemczyk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. Niemczyk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. Niemczyk more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. Niemczyk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. Niemczyk. The network helps show where E. Niemczyk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. Niemczyk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. Niemczyk.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. Niemczyk based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with E. Niemczyk. E. Niemczyk is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Niemczyk, E., et al.. (2002). Zasady i mozliwosci integrowanej produkcji porzeczki w Polsce. Progress in Plant Protection. 42(1). 46–52.1 indexed citations
5.
Niemczyk, E., et al.. (2002). Selektywnosc preparatow Pirimix 100 PC, Pirimor 25 WG, Trebon 10 SC i Aztec 140 EW dla drapieznego roztocza dobroczynka gruszowca [Typhlodromus pyri]. 10. 171–177.1 indexed citations
Niemczyk, E., et al.. (2000). Occurrence and effectiveness of predatory mites (Phytoseiidae) in controlling two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae Koch) on blackcurrants.. 23(11). 53–56.1 indexed citations
8.
Niemczyk, E., et al.. (2000). Usefulness of Mospilan 20 SP in integrated pest management of soft fruits.. 23(11). 137–140.1 indexed citations
9.
Niemczyk, E., et al.. (1999). The occurrence of phytophagous and predatory mites in an apple orchard sprayed with selective and non selective insecticides. Journal of Plant Protection Research. 39(2).2 indexed citations
10.
Niemczyk, E.. (1999). Occurrence and effectiveness of some predatory bugs (Heteroptera) in apple orchards.3 indexed citations
11.
Niemczyk, E.. (1998). Effectiveness of predatory mites [Phytoseiidae] in limiting population of two-spotted spider mites [Tetranychus urticae Koch] on black currants. 2. 65–74.1 indexed citations
Olszak, R.W., et al.. (1992). The spider community associated with apple trees under different pressure of pesticides. Polish Journal of Ecology. 40(2). 265–286.18 indexed citations
Niemczyk, E. & R.W. Olszak. (1988). Effectiveness of granulosis virus for codling moth (Laspeyresia pomonella L.) control in Poland.3 indexed citations
16.
Olszak, R.W. & E. Niemczyk. (1987). The predaceous coccinellidae associated with aphids in apple orchards. Ekologia Polska. 34(4). 711–722.7 indexed citations
Niemczyk, E., et al.. (1980). Applying bacterial preparations against orchard pests.. 416–419.1 indexed citations
19.
Niemczyk, E., et al.. (1976). The effectiveness of the bacterial preparation Dipel in controlling the codling moth (Laspeyresia pomonella L.) and leaf rollers (Tortricidae) during the summer period.. 6(1). 151–157.1 indexed citations
20.
Niemczyk, E., et al.. (1975). Effectiveness of bacterial preparation Thuricide 90TS to control leaf rollers (Tortricidae) in apple-orchards.. 5(1). 75–85.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.