Ignasi Rodríguez‐Pintó
- Rheumatology top 0.5%
- Hematology top 2%
- Nephrology top 2%
- Immunology top 10%
- Genetics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Ricard CerveraGerard EspinosaDoruk ErkanYehuda ShoenfeldNancy Agmon‐LevinHoward AmitalHoracio BermanN. Costedoat‐Chalumeau
- Topics
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (34 papers)Platelet Disorders and Treatments (14 papers)Blood disorders and treatments (8 papers)
- Cited by
- RheumatologyHematologyNephrology
- Journals
- Frontiers in ImmunologyAnnals of the Rheumatic DiseasesJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited StatesIsrael
In The Last Decade
Ignasi Rodríguez‐Pintó
40 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Rheumatology 996
- Hematology 573
- Nephrology 286
- Immunology 273
- Genetics 211
Countries citing papers authored by Ignasi Rodríguez‐Pintó
This map shows the geographic impact of Ignasi Rodríguez‐Pintó's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ignasi Rodríguez‐Pintó with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ignasi Rodríguez‐Pintó more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ignasi Rodríguez‐Pintó
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ignasi Rodríguez‐Pintó. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ignasi Rodríguez‐Pintó. The network helps show where Ignasi Rodríguez‐Pintó may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ignasi Rodríguez‐Pintó
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ignasi Rodríguez‐Pintó. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ignasi Rodríguez‐Pintó based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ignasi Rodríguez‐Pintó. Ignasi Rodríguez‐Pintó is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 31 | |
| 12 | 38 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 26 | |
| 16 | 40 | |
| 17 | 30 | |
| 18 | 130 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 29 |
About Ignasi Rodríguez‐Pintó
Ignasi Rodríguez‐Pintó is a scholar working on Rheumatology, Hematology and Nephrology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (34 papers), Platelet Disorders and Treatments (14 papers) and Blood disorders and treatments (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rheumatology (996 citations), Hematology (573 citations) and Nephrology (286 citations). Ignasi Rodríguez‐Pintó has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Ricard Cervera, Gerard Espinosa, Doruk Erkan, Yehuda Shoenfeld, Nancy Agmon‐Levin, Yehuda Shoenfeld, Howard Amital, Horacio Berman, N. Costedoat‐Chalumeau and Nathalie Morel. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Immunology, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases and Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.